Consciousness and cognition in Classical Sāṃkhya metaphysics

  1. Ferrández Formoso, Raquel 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Zeitschrift:
Indialogs: Spanish journal of India studies

ISSN: 2339-8523

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Titel der Ausgabe: Gender

Ausgabe: 7

Seiten: 63-78

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5565/REV/INDIALOGS.134 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Indialogs: Spanish journal of India studies

Zusammenfassung

This article explores the psychological dimension of classical Sāṃkhya philosophy, on the basis of its canonical treatise, Sāṃkhyakārikā of Īśvarakṛṣṇa (4th Century AD). The strong dualism defended by this ancient metaphysics establishes a division between what we will designate as the phenomenon of consciousness (puruṣa) and the cognitive phenomena (prakṛti). According to our approach, Sāṃkhya seems to offer a mechanical model of mind by means of an introspective self-research. In fact, we will argue that  in this system of thought, mind is regarded as an artificial extension of consciousness. Considering the Sāṃkhya classical treatise as the report of a meditative experience, our main purpose is to examine some key points of this dualism. To this end, we also take account of certain Western theories of mind, as well as certain aspects included in another Indian philosophy greatly influenced by the Sāṃkhya system, namely, the classical Yoga of Patañjali.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • BORODY, W., (trans.) (2005) Bhogakārikā of Sadyojyoti with the Commentary of Aghora Śiva. New Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.
  • BURLEY, M. (trans.) (20122ª) “The Sāṃkhyakārikā of Īśvarakṛṣṇa”, in: Classical Sāṃkhya and Yoga. An Indian metaphysics of experience. New York: Routledge.
  • LARSON, G.J. (trans.) (2017) “The Sāṃkhyakārikā of Īśvarakṛsṇa”, in: Classical Sāṃkhya: An interpretation of its History and Meaning. New Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.
  • PUJOL, Ò. (trans.) (2016) Yogasūtra de Patañjali. Barcelona: Kairós.
  • VILLEGAS, L. (trans.) (2016) Sāṃkhyakārikā de Īśvarakṛṣṇa. Barcelona: Kairós.
  • ARNAU, J. (2013) Cosmologías de India. Védica, sāṃkhya y budista. Madrid: Fondo de cultura económica.
  • BHATTACARYYA, N.N. (2005). History of tantric religion, New Delhi: Manohar.
  • BLOCK, N., (1996). “Consciousness”, In: Samuel Guttenplan (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Blackwell: 210-217.
  • BLOCK, N. (1998) “The mind as a software of the brain”, In: Edward E. Smith, Daniel N. Osherson (eds). Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science (vol.3), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 377-425.
  • BURLEY, M. (20172ª). Classical Sāṃkhya and Yoga. An Indian Metaphysics of Experience. New York: Routledge.
  • CLARK, A. & CHALMERS, D.(1998) “The Extended Mind”, Analysis, vol. 58, Nº 1: 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  • FODOR, J. (2009) “Where is my mind?” [Review of the book Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension], London Review of Books, vol. 31, Nº3: 13-15. Retrieved from https://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n03/jerry-fodor/where-is-my-mind
  • FILLIOZAT, P.S. (1988). “Le Tattvasamgraha, 'Compendium de Essences' de Sadyojyoti”, In: Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême Orient. Tome 77.
  • KAPANI, L. (1993). La Notion de Saṃskāra. Paris: Diffusion de Boccard.
  • KAUL, M. (2018). “Ontological hierarchy in the Tantrāloka of Abhinavagupta”, In: Sharada Bäumer and H.Sainton (ed.) Tantrapuṣpāñjali. Tantric Traditions and Philosophy of Kashmir, New Delhi: Aryan Books International.
  • LARSON, G.J.(20176~). Classical sāṃkhya. An interpretation of its History and Meaning. New Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.
  • LARSON, G.J.; BHATTACARYA, R.S. (1987). Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies. Sāṃkhya. Vol. IV. New Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass
  • PIREDA, G. (2017) “The mark of the cognitive and the coupling-constitution fallacy: a defense of the extended mind hypothesis”, Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 8: 2061. https://doi.org/10:3389/fpsyg.2017.02061
  • PICCININI, G. (2009) “Computationalism in the Philosophy of Mind”, Philosophy Compass, vol. 4, Nº 3: 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00215.x
  • PUJOL, Ò. (2016) (trad.) Yogasūtra de Patañjali. Kairós: Barcelona.
  • PUJOL, Ò., DOMÍNGUEZ, A., (2009) Patañjali-Spinoza. Valencia: Pretextos.
  • RANGANATHAN, S. (2017) Ethics and the History of Indian Philosophy. New Delhi: Motilal Barnasidass.
  • SAMUEL, G. (2008). The Origins of Yoga and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • TOLA, F., DRAGONETTI, C. (2008). Filosofía de la India. Del veda al vedānta. El sistema sāṃkhya. Barcelona: Kairós.
  • VARELA, J., THOMPSON, E., ROSH, E. (19972ª) De cuerpo presente. Las ciencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • VILLEGAS, L. (trans.) (2016) Sāṃkhyakārikā de Īśvarakṛṣṇa, Barcelona: Kairós.
  • WHICHER, I. (1998). The Integrity of Yoga Darśana. A Reconsideration of Classical Yoga. New York: State University of New York.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet