Why is it so difficult to investigate violent radicalization?

  1. Gómez, Ángel 1
  2. Vázquez, Alexandra 1
  3. Chinchilla, Juana 1
  4. Blanco, Laura 1
  5. Alba, Beatriz 1
  6. Chiclana, Sandra 2
  7. González-Álvarez, José Luis 3
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias
  3. 3 Dirección General de la Guardia Civil (Spain)
Zugehörigkeit anzeigen +
Zeitschrift:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Nummer: 26

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2023.2 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Zusammenfassung

Imagine that you are a researcher interested in disentangling the underlying mechanisms that motivate certain individuals to self-sacrifice for a group or an ideology. Now, visualize that you are one of a few privileged that have the possibility of interviewing people who have been involved in some of the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. What should you do? Most investigations focused on terrorism do not include empirical data and just a handful of fortunate have made face-to-face interviews with these individuals. Therefore, we might conclude that most experts in the field have not directly met the challenge of experiencing studying violent radicalization in person. As members of a research team who have talked with individuals under risk of radicalization, current, and former terrorists, our main goal with this manuscript is to synopsize a series of ten potential barriers that those interested in the subject might find when making fieldwork, and alternatives to solve them. If all the efforts made by investigators could save the life of a potential victim, prevent an individual from becoming radicalized, or make him/her decide to abandon the violence associated with terrorism, all our work will have been worthwhile.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Arce, D. G., Croson, R. T., & Eckel, C. C. (2011). Terrorism experiments. Journal of Peace Research, 48(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310391502
  • Atran, S. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Faith, brotherhood, and the (un)making of terrorists. Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Bakker, E. (2015). Terrorism and counterterrorism studies: Comparing theory and practice. Leiden University Press.
  • Conway, M. (2021). Online extremism and terrorism research ethics: Researcher safety, informed consent, and the need for tailored guidelines. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(2), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880235
  • Decker, S. H., & Pyrooz, D. C. (2015). “I’m down for a Jihad”: How 100 years of gang research can inform the study of terrorism, radicalization and extremism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(1), 104–112.
  • Dolnik, A. (2000). Conducting terrorism field research: A guide. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203563809
  • Dolnik, A. (2011). Conducting field research on terrorism: A brief primer. Perspectives on Terrorism, 5(2), 3–35.
  • Dolnik, A. (Ed.). (2013). Conducting terrorism field research. Routledge.
  • Feddes, A. R., & Gallucci, M. (2015). A literature review on methodology used in evaluating effects of preventive and de-radicalisation interventions. Journal for Deradicalization, Winter 15/16, Article 5.
  • Freilich, J. D., Chermak, S. M., & Gruenewald, J. (2015). The future of terrorism research: A review essay. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2014.922321
  • Gallacher, J. D., Heerdink, M. W., & Hewstone, M. (2021). Online engagement between opposing political protest groups via social media is linked to physical violence of offline encounters. Social Media+ Society, 7(1). http://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984445
  • Gómez, A., Atran, S., Chinchilla, J., Vázquez, A., López-Rodríguez, L., Paredes, B., Martínez, M., Blanco, L., Alba, B., Bautista, H., Fernández, S., Pozuelo-Rubio, F., González-Álvarez, J. L., Chiclana, S., Valladares-Narganes, H., Alonso, M., Ruíz-Alvarado, A., López-Novo, J. L., & Davis, R. (2022). Willingness to sacrifice among convicted Islamist terrorists versus violent gang members and other criminals. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 2596. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06590-0
  • Gómez, Á., Bélanger, J. J., Chinchilla, J., Vázquez, A., Schumpe, B. M., Nisa, C. F. & Chiclana, S. (2021). Admiration for Islamist groups encourages self-sacrifice through identity fusion. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00734-9
  • Gómez, A., Chiclana, S., Chinchilla, J., Blanco, L., Alba, B., Bautista, H., & Pozuelo-Rubio, F. (2022). The mirage of the jihad. Disenchantment as the pathway to disengagement of female jihadists. A case study about radicalization in Spanish prisons. International Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 586–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2022.2096254
  • Gómez, A., Chinchilla, J., Vázquez, A., López‐Rodríguez, L., Paredes, B., & Martínez, M. (2020). Recent advances, misconceptions, untested assumptions, and future research agenda for identity fusion theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(6), Article e12531. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12531
  • Gómez, Á., López-Rodríguez, L., Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Wilson, L., Waziri, H., Vázquez, A., Davis, R., & Atran, S. (2017). The devoted actor’s will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human conflict. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(9), 673– 679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0193-3
  • Gómez, Á., Martínez, M., Martel, F. A., López-Rodríguez, L., Vázquez, A., Chinchilla, J., Paredes, B., Hettiarachchi, M., Hamid, N., & Swann, W. B. (2021). Why people enter and embrace violent groups Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 614657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614657
  • Gómez, Á., & Vázquez, A. (2015). El poder de ‘sentirse uno’ con un grupo: Fusión de la identidad y conductas progrupales extremas [The power of ‘feeling one’ with a group: Identity fusion and extreme pro-group behaviours]. International Journal of Social Psychology, 30(3), 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2015.1065089
  • Gómez, Á., & Vázquez, A. (2021). Extremismo, radicalización violenta y terrorismo [Extremism, violent radicalization and terrorism]. Sanz y Torres.
  • González-Álvarez, J. L., Santos-Hermoso, J., López-Novo, J. L., Chiclana de la Fuente, S., Pozuelo- Rubio, F., Fernández-Gómez, C., & Lanza-Comenaux, C. (2021). Construcción y validación de la herramienta de clasificación y de valoración del riesgo de radicalismo violento en el ámbito penitenciario [Construction and validation of the tool for classifying and assessing the risk of violent radicalism in the prison environment] (Documentos Penitenciarios 27). Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias.
  • Haghani, M., Kuligowski, E., Rajabifard, A., & Lentini, P. (2022). Fifty years of scholarly research on terrorism: Intellectual progression, structural composition, trends and knowledge gaps of the field. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68, Article 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102714
  • Hamid, N., Pretus, C., Atran, S., Crockett, M. J., Ginges, J., Sheikh, H., Tobeña, A., Carmona, S., Gómez, A., Davis, R., & Vilarroya, O. (2019). Neuroimaging ‘will to fight’ for sacred values: An empirical case study with supporters of an AlQaeda associate. Royal Society Open Science, 6, Article 181585. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181585
  • Horgan, J. G. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. Routledge.
  • Horgan, J. G. (2012). Interviewing the terrorists: Reflections on fieldwork and implications for psychological research. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 4(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2011.594620
  • Jugl, I., Lösel, F., Bender, D., & King, S. (2021). Psychosocial prevention programs against radicalization and extremism: A meta-analysis of outcome evaluations. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2021a6
  • Karpova, A., Savelev, A., Vilnin, A., & Kuznetsov, S. (2022). Method for detecting far-right extremist communities on social media. Social Sciences, 11(5), Article 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050200
  • Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190851125.001.0001
  • Morrison, J., Silke, A., & Bont, E. (2021). The development of the framework for research ethics in terrorism studies (FRETS). Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880196
  • Neumann, P., & Kleinmann, S. (2013). How rigorous is radicalization research? Democracy and Security, 9(4), 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2013.802984
  • Parekh, D., Amarasingam, A., Dawson, L., & Ruths, D. (2018). Studying jihadists on social media: A critique of data collection methodologies. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(3), 5–23.
  • Pretus, C., Hamid, N., Sheikh, H., Gómez, Á., Ginges, J., Tobeña, A., Davis, R., Vilarroya, O., & Atran, S. (2019). Ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal interactions underlie will to fight and die for a cause. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz034
  • Schmidt, R. (2021). When fieldwork ends: Navigating ongoing contact with former insurgents. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(2), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880228
  • Schuurman, B. (2019). Topics in terrorism research: Reviewing trends and gaps, 2007– 2016. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1579777
  • Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1439023
  • Sheikh, H., Gómez, Á., & Atran, S. (2016). Empirical evidence for the devoted actor model. Current Anthropology, 57(13), S204–S209. https://doi.org/10.1086/686221
  • Silke, A. (2019). The study of terrorism and counter terrorism. In Silke, A. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of terrorism and counterterrorism (pp. 1–10). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744636
  • Swann, W. B. Jr., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028589
  • Taylor, M., & Horgan, J. (2021). Primum non nocere–First do no harm. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(2), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880239
  • Tossell, C. C., Gómez, A., de Visser, E. J., Vázquez, A., Donadio, B. T., Metcalfe, A., Rogan, C., Davis, R., & Atran, S. (2022). Spiritual over physical formidability determines willingness to fight and sacrifice through loyalty in cross-cultural populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6), Article e2113076119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113076119
  • Weinberg, L. (2019). A history of terrorism. In Silke, A. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of terrorism and counterterrorism (pp. 34–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744636
  • Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2021). Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(3), Article e1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1174
  • Young, J. K., & Findley, M. G. (2011). Promise and pitfalls of terrorism research. International Studies Review, 13(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01015.x
  • Youngman, M. (2020). Building “terrorism studies” as an interdisciplinary space: Addressing recurring issues in the study of terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1520702
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet