La hermenéutica bíblica hobbesiana en el «Leviatán»

  1. García-Alonso, Marta 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Zeitschrift:
Estudios eclesiásticos: Revista de investigación e información teológica y canónica

ISSN: 0210-1610

Datum der Publikation: 2023

Ausgabe: 98

Nummer: 385

Seiten: 305-337

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.14422/EE.V98.I385.Y2023.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Estudios eclesiásticos: Revista de investigación e información teológica y canónica

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

En este artículo vamos a analizar la redefinición a la que Hobbes somete en el Leviatán a los elementos esenciales de la hermenéutica bíblica protestante. Según el filósofo inglés definir las reglas que sirven para elaborar una exégesis adecuada, así como fijar el contenido que resulta de ello, es tarea del soberano, único intérprete autorizado de la Biblia. En base a estas ideas. Hobbes promueve la fundamentación de una nueva relación entre el poder civil y eclesial que le introduce como uno de los filósofos principales del debate teológico-político del siglo XVII.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Albertz, Rainer. Historia de la religión de Israel en tiempos del Antiguo Testamento. Vol. 1. Madrid: Trotta, 1999.
  • Barrow, Isaac. A Treatise of the Pope’s Supremacy. London: M. Flesher, 1680. Consultado en enero de 2022. https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=xMpaq_WY8foC&pg=GBS.PP4&hl=es
  • Bellarmino, Roberto. Disputationes de controversiis christianae fidei adversus huius temporis haereticos. Lyon: Ioannen Phillehotte, 1610.
  • Bernier, Jean. La critique du Pentateuque de Hobbes à Calmet. Paris: Champion, 2010.
  • Brito Vieira, Mónica. The Elements of Representation in Hobbes. Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State. Leiden: Brill, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004181748.i-286
  • Calvin, Jean. Institution de la religion chrétienne. Editado por Jean Daniel Benoît, 5 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1957-1963.
  • Champion, Justin. “‘Directions for the Profitable Reading of the Holy Scriptures’: Biblical Criticism, Clerical Learning and Lay Readers, c. 1650-1720”. En Scripture and Scholarship in Early Modern England, editado por Ariel Hessayon y Nicholas Keene, 208-3. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.
  • Champion, Justin. “Syllables governe the world’: Biblical Criticism, Erudition, Heterodoxy and Thomas Hobbes”. En The English Bible in the Early Modern World, editado por Robert Armstrong y Tadhg Ó Hannracháin, 183-212. Leiden: Brill, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004347977_010
  • Collins, Jeffrey. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • Craig Jr., Hardin. “The Geneva Bible as a Political Document”. The Pacific Historical Review 7 (1938): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3633847
  • Curley, Edwin. “Calvin and Hobbes, or, Hobbes as an Orthodox Christian”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34, n.º 2 (1996): 257-87. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1996.0030
  • Curley, Edwin. “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan”. En Leviathan after 350 years, editado por Tom Sorell y Luc Foisneau, 199-216. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Elazar, Daniel J. “Hobbes confronts Scripture”. Jewish Political Studies Review 4, n.º 2 (1992): 3-24.
  • García-Alonso, Marta. “Biblical Law as the source of morality in Calvin”. History of Political Thought 32 (2011): 1-19.
  • García-Alonso, Marta. “El problema eclesiológico-político del Leviatán en contexto”. Araucaria 24, n.º 49 (2022): 103-122. https://doi.org/10.12795/araucaria.2022.i49.05
  • Green, Ian. Print and Protestantism in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208600.001.0001
  • Grislis, Egil. “Scriptural Hermeneutics”. En A Companion to Richard Hooker, editado por Torrance Kirby, 273-304. Boston: Brill, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165342.i-670.53
  • Grislis, Egil. “The Hermeneutical Problem in Richard Hooker”. En Studies in Richard Hooker, editado por W. Speed Hill, 162-187. Cleveland: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1972.
  • Grocio, Hugo. De veritate religionis christianae. Paris, 1627.
  • Heering, Jan-Paul, ed. Hugo Grotius as Apologist for the Christian religion: A study of his work De veritate religionis Christianae, 1640. Leiden: Brill, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404880
  • Heyd, Michael. “The Reaction to Enthusiasm in the Seventeenth Century: Towards an Integrative Approach”. The Journal of Modern History 53, n.º 2 (1981): 258-280. https://doi.org/10.1086/242286
  • Hill, Speed. W. “Richard Hooker and the Rhetoric of History”. Churchman 114, n.º 1 (2000): 7-21.
  • Hobbes, Tomas. Leviatán. Editado por Carlos Mellizo. Barcelona: Altaya, 1994. https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=fwMFAAAAYAAJ&hl=es&pg=GBS.PA201
  • Kyle, Richard G. God’s Watchman: John Knox’s Faith and Vocation. Oregon: Pickwick, 2014.
  • Lagrée, Jaqueline. “Grotius, Stoicisme et Religion Naturelle”. Grotiana 10, n.º 1 (1989): 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1163/187607589X00063
  • Lagrée, Jaqueline. La raison ardente, Religion naturelle et raison au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin, 1991. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.lagre.1991.01
  • Lambert, Thomas. Preaching, Praying and Policing the Reform in Sixteenth Century Geneva. Ann Arbor: Michigan, University Microfilms International, 2000.
  • Laplanche, François. L’Écriture, le sacré et l’histoire. Érudits et politiques protestants devant la Bible en France au XVIIè. Amsterdam: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1986.
  • Lecler, Joseph. “Protestantisme et ‘libre examen’. Les étapes et le vocabulaire d’une controverse”. Recherches de science religieuse 57 (1969): 321-374.
  • Lorimer, Peter. John Knox and the Church of England: His Work in Her Pulpit and His Influence Upon Her Liturgy, Articles, and Parties. London: H. S. King & Company, 1875.
  • Lutero, Martin. Assertio omnium articulorum. http://www.martinluther.dk/ass01.html
  • Lutero, Martin. De servo arbitrio. http://www.martinluther.dk/serv-arbit01.html#n0
  • Lutero, Martin. Obras reunidas 2: El siervo albedrío y otros escritos polémicos. Editado por Gabriel Tomás. Madrid: Trotta, 2019.
  • Lutero, Martin. Weimarer Ausgabe. Luthers Werke. Studienausgabe. Editado por Otto Clemen, 4 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1983.
  • Malcolm, Noel. “Hobbes, Ezra, and the Bible: The History of a Subversive Idea”. En Aspects of Hobbes, editado por Noel Malcolm, 383-432. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247145.003.0012
  • Martinich, Aloysius. “Hobbes’s Erastianism and Interpretation”. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70, n.º 1 (2009): 143-63.
  • Martinich, Aloysius. “The Interpretation of Covenants in Leviathan”. En Leviathan after 350 years, editado por Tom Sorell y Luc Foisneau, 216-240. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264612.003.0011
  • Martinich, Aloysius. The Two Gods of Leviathan. Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624810
  • McCoy, Charles, y Baker Wayne. Fountainhead of Federalism. Heinrich Bullinger and the Convenantal Tradition. Louisville (Ky.): Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991.
  • McGrade, Arthur Stephen. “Introduction”. En Richard Hooker On the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, editado por W. Speed Hill, vol. VI-I. NY: Center for Medieval & Renaissance Text and Studies, 1993.
  • Monter, William. “The Consistory of Geneva, 1559-1569”. Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Reanissance 38 (1976): 467-484.
  • Morrow, Jeffrey L. “Leviathan and the Swallowing of Scripture: The Politics behind Thomas Hobbes Early Modern Biblical Criticism”. Christianity and Literature 61, n.º 1 (2011): 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/014833311106100104
  • Nellen, Henk. “Minimal Religion, Deism and Socinianism: On Grotius’s Motives for Writing De Veritate”. Grotiana 33 (2012): 25-57. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-03300006
  • Nijenhuis, Willem. “Beza’s treatise ‘De triplici episcopatu’”. En Kerkhistorische Bijdragen. Vol. 1, Ecclesia Reformata. Leiden: Brill, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381797
  • Pacchi, Arrigo. “Hobbes and Biblical Philology in the Service of the State”. Topoi 7 (1988): 231-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02028423
  • Pangle, Thomas L. “Thomas Hobbes Confronts the Bible”. Jewish Political Studies Review 4, n.º 2 (1992): 25-57.
  • Pitassi, Maria Cristina. “Fondements de la croyance et statut de l’Écriture: Bayle et la question de l’examen”. En Les ‘Éclaircissements’ de Pierre Bayle, dirigido por Hubert Bost y Antony McKenna, 143-160. Paris: Champion, 2010.
  • Pitassi, Maria Cristina. “La généalogie du mythe protestant du libre examen de l’Écriture. Protestantisme, nation, identité”. En Actes en Hommage à Myriam Yardeni, editado por Michelle Magdelaine y Viviane Rosen-Prest. Paris. Consultado en enero de 2022. https://hal.science/hal-03165641/document
  • Pitassi, Maria Cristina. “Pratiques de lecture de la Bible en milieu réformé au XVIIe siecle”. En Les protestants à l’époque moderne. Une approche anthropologique, editado por O. Christin y Y. Krumenacker. 77-87. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.157562
  • Pocock, John. G. A. “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes”. En Politics, Language and Time,148-201. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1960.
  • Popkin, Richard. “Spinoza and La Peyrere”. En Spinoza, New Perspectives, editado por Robert W. Shahan y J. I. Biro, 177-95. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1978.
  • Popkin, Richard. The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Preus, J. Samuel. “The Bible and Religion in the Century of Genius: Part II: The Rise and Fall of the Bible”. Religion 28 (1998): 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1997.0116
  • Prior, Charles W. A. “Hebraism and the problem of church and state in England, 1642–1660”. The Seventeenth Century 28, n.º 1 (2013): 37-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2012.758420
  • Runciman, David. “What Kind of Person is Hobbes’s State? A Reply to Skinner”. Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000): 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00102
  • Russo, Domenic. Hermeneutical Themes in the Writings of Richard Hooker: The Complications of Sola Scriptura. Tesis de doctorado en Teología, University of St. Michael’s College, Faculty of Theology, 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/70997
  • Simon, Irene. Three Restoration Divines: Barrow, South, Tillotson. Selected Sermons. Vol. I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1967. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pulg.3173
  • Skinner, Quentin. “Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State”. The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, n.º 1 (1999): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00063
  • Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598579
  • Stanford, William. “John Knox’s Theology of Political Government”. The Sixteenth Century Journal 19, n.º 4 (1988): 529-540. https://doi.org/10.2307/2540985
  • Stengers, Jean. “D’une définition du libre examen”. Revue de l’Université de Bruxelles 8, n.º 1 (1955-1956): 32-61.
  • Strauss, Leo. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1996.
  • Strehle, Stephen. Calvinism, Federalism, and Scholasticism. Berna: Peter Lang, 1988.
  • Tuck, Richard. “The Christian Atheism of Thomas Hobbes”. En Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment, editado por Michael Hunter y David Wootton, 111-130. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198227366.003.0005
  • Tuck, Richard. Philosophy and government 1572-1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558634
  • Watson, Alan. “The Evolution of Law: The Roman System of Contracts”. Law and History Review 2, n.º 1 (1984): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/743908
  • Whipple, John. “Hobbes on miracles”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89, n.º 1 (2008): 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00312.x
  • Wright, George. “Curley and Martinich in Dubious Battle”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40, n.º 4 (2002): 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2002.0088