Nobody can trust or believe anythingBrexit, populism and digital politics

  1. Diana Ortega Martín 1
  2. Alejandro Sánchez Berrocal 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 CSIC - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Revista:
Dilemata

ISSN: 1989-7022

Ano de publicación: 2022

Título do exemplar: Verdad, desinformación y verificación: retos epistémicos y morales

Número: 38

Páxinas: 87-105

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Dilemata

Resumo

In this article, we focus on the link between the new populisms and the crisis of neoliberal capitalism, as well as its post-democratic forms of governance, in the context of digital politics and its social ef-fects, such as the intense polarisation of public life or the distrust of cit-izens towards traditional forms of politics. Brexit is a paradigmatic case that encapsulates all of these problems and prompts us to think about how philosophy can challenge the way we understand contemporary political coordinates, modes of socialisation, or democratic action. The weakness of our deliberative democracies and the undermining of the bonds, interaction, and decision-making within our civil society seem to have found a compensatory function in the digital world. By carrying out a philosophical-political and film analysis of Brexit: The Uncivil War (Toby Haynes, 2019); we would like to focus specifically on how digital media foster the conditions for the success of a populist moment like Brexit

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adorno, Th. W. (2004). Escritos Sociológicos I. Madrid, Akal.
  • Ahluwalia, P. & Miller, T. (2016). “Brexit: the way of dealing with populism”. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 22 (4-6), pp. 453-454.
  • Andretta, M. & Bracciale, R. (2017). “Social media, campaigning e comunicazione politica: elementi di scenario”, in Andretta, M. & Bracciale, R. (eds.). Social media campaigning: le elezioni regionali in #Toscana2015. Pisa, Pisa University Press, pp. 7-29.
  • Arendt, H. (1979). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego/New York/London, Harvest Books.
  • Arias Maldonado, M. (2016). “La digitalización de la conversación pública: redes sociales, afectividad política y democracia”. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 173, pp. 27-54.
  • Baldini, G., Bressanelli, E. & Gianfreda, S. (2020). “Taking back control? Brexit, sovereignism and populism in Westminster (2015–17)”. European Politics and Society, 21 (2), pp. 219-234. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1632584.
  • Beck, U. & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge, Polity Press.
  • Bergmann, E. (2018). Populism and the politics of misinformation. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Boriello, A. & Jäger, A. (2021). “The antinomies of Ernesto Laclau: a reassessment”. Ideology, theory, practice. https://www.ideology-theory-practice.org/blog/the-antinomies-of-ernesto-laclau-a-reassessment# (last accessed: 17.04.2022).
  • Browning, C.S. (2019). “Brexit populism and fantasies of fulfilment”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32 (3), pp. 222-244. DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1567461.
  • Carreras, M., Irepoglu Carreras, Y., & Bowler, S. (2019). “Long-Term Economic Distress, Cultural Backlash, and Support for Brexit”. Comparative Political Studies, 52 (9), pp. 1396–1424. DOI: 10.1177/0010414019830714.
  • Cayla, D. (2020). Populisme et néolibéralisme. Brussels, De Boeck.
  • Clarke, J. & Newman, J. (2017). “‘People in this country have had enough of experts’: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism”. Critical Policy Studies, 11 (1), pp. 101-116. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2017.1282376.
  • Closs Stephens, A. (2019). “Feeling “Brexit”: Nationalism and the Affective Politics of Movement”. GeoHumanities, 5 (2), pp. 405-423. DOI: 10.1080/2373566X.2019.1620623.
  • Cox, M. (2017). “The rise of populism and the crisis of globalisation: Brexit, Trump and beyond”. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 28, pp. 9-17.
  • Dans, E. (2018). “Did Social Networks Cause Populism?” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/enriquedans/2018/12/03/social-networks-and-populism-cause-and-effect/ (last accessed: 19.04.2022).
  • De Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). “Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23 (4), pp. 423-438.
  • Dobre, D. (2021). “Constitución económica: una propuesta al debate conceptual”. Revista de Derecho Público: Teoría y Método, 3, pp. 157-198. DOI: 10.37417/RPD/vol_3_2021_573.
  • Duerto, P. (2021). “Cuerpos acelerados: un análisis de los efectos de la temporalidad neoliberal en la subjetividad”. Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 24 (3), pp. 505-517. DOI: 10.5209/rpub.79248.
  • Farrand, B. & Carrapico, H. (2021). “‘People like that cannot be trusted’: populist and technocratic political styles, legitimacy, and distrust in the context of Brexit negotiations”. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17 (2), pp. 147-165. DOI: 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1186.
  • Fazi, T. & Iodice, G. (2016). La battaglia contro l’Europa. Roma, Fazi Editore.
  • Featherstone, K. (2001). “The political dynamics of the vincolo esterno: the emergence of EMU and the challenge to the European Social Model”. Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation No. 6/2001. Belfast, Queens University Belfast.
  • Fernández-Jardón, F. & Sánchez Berrocal, A. (2021). “‘Geef die Italianen en Spanjaarden niet dat geld!’. La vieja nueva normalidad de la Unión Europea: crisis pandémica, economía política e ideología”. Materialismo Storico Rivista di Filosofia, Storia e Scienze Umane, 9 (2), pp. 373–477. DOI: 10.14276/2531-9582.2477.
  • Finlayson, A. (2022). “Brexit, YouTube and the Populist Rhetorical Ethos”, in Kock, C. & Villadsen, L. (eds.). Populist Rhetorics: Case Studies and a Minimalist Definition. London, Palgrave Macmillian, pp. 81-106. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87351-6_4.
  • Galli, C. (2019). Sovranità. Bologna, Il Mulino.
  • Garland, C. (2019). “Taking Back Control of Nothing: Elites Denouncing Elites to Mobilize Populism in the Service of Power - from NAFTA to Trump, Brexit and the EU”. Fast Capitalism, 16 (1), pp. 55-67. DOI: 10.32855/ fcapital.201901.006.
  • Garzón Costumero, X. (2021). “La identidad online. El proceso de adscripción y detentación identitaria desde los márgenes. Subversión y agenciamiento feminista”. Bajo Palabra, 28, pp. 218–235. DOI: 10.15366/ bp2021.28.010.
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2015). “Social Media Activism, the Generic Internet User and Interactive Direct Democracy”, in Trottier, D. y Fuchs, C. (eds.). Social Media, Politics and the State. London, Routledge, pp. 67-87.
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2018). “Social media and populism: an elective affinity?” Media, Culture & Society, 40 (5), pp. 745-753.
  • Haynes, T. (2019). Brexit: The Uncivil War. [Film]. Channel 4, House Productions, HBO.
  • Lance Bennett, W. (2012). “The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644 (1), pp. 20–39.
  • Manucci, L. (2017). “Populism and the Media”, in Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P. & Ostiguy, P. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 467-488.
  • Monk, C. & Sargeant, A. (2015). British Historical Cinema. London, Routledge.
  • Moss, J., Robinson, E., & Watts, J. (2020). “Brexit and the Everyday Politics of Emotion: Methodological Lessons from History”. Political Studies, 68 (4), pp. 837–856. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720911915.
  • Mudde, C. (2004). “The Populist Zeitgeist”. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), pp. 541-563.
  • Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. F. (2018). “Understanding Brexit: Cultural Resentment Versus Economic Grievances (July 30, 2018)”. HKS Working Paper No. RWP18-021, pp. 1-32. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3222901.
  • O’Toole, F. (2018). Heroic Failure: Brexit and the Politics of Pain. New York, Apollo.
  • Pirro, A. L., & Taggart, P. (2018). “The populist politics of Euroscepticism in times of crisis: A framework for analysis”. Politics, 38 (3), pp. 253–262. DOI: 10.1177/0263395718770579.
  • Piven, F. F. (1997). “Is it Global Economics or Neo-laissez-faire?”, in Schram, S. F. y Neisser, P. T. (eds.). Tales of the State: Narrative in Contemporary US Politics and Public Policy. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield International, pp. 234-241.
  • Rega, R. & Bracciale, R. (2018). “La self-personalization dei leader politici su Twitter. Tra professionalizzazione e intimizzazione”. The Lab’s Quarterly, 2, pp. 61-68.
  • Richards, L., Heath, A., & Elgenius, G. (2020). “Remainers are nostalgic too: An exploration of attitudes towards the past and Brexit preferences”. The British journal of sociology, 71 (1), pp. 74–80. DOI: 10.1111/1468- 4446.12710.
  • Ruzza, C. & Pejovic, M. (2019). “Populism at work: the language of the Brexiteers and the European Union”. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4), pp. 432-448. DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2019.1605300.
  • Sciortino, R. (2019). I dieci anni che sconvolsero il mondo. Crisi globale e geopolitica dei neopopulismi. Trieste, Asterios.
  • Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time. The delayed crisis of capitalism. London, Verso.
  • Tsarouhas, D. (2019). “The EU in Crises: Brexit, Populism and the Future of the Union”, in Diamond, P. (ed.). The crisis of globalization. Democracy, Capitalism and Inequality in the Twenty-First Century. London, I.B. Tauris, pp. 127-143. DOI: 10.5040/9781788316309.ch-007.
  • Valls Oyarzun, E. (2020). James Bond contra el Dr. Brexit. Madrid, Guillermo Escolar Editor.
  • Wagner, A. (2021). “Política y deliberación pública. Reflexiones desde la filosofía práctica kantiana”, in Villacañas, J.L. & Sánchez Madrid, N. (eds.). El ethos del republicanismo cosmopolita. Perspectivas euroamericanas sobre Kant. Berna, Peter Lang, pp. 139-151.
  • Weiss, L. (1997). “Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State”. New Left Review, 225, pp. 3-27.
  • Wood, J. D. G. & Ausserladscheider, V. (2021). “Populism, Brexit, and the manufactured crisis of British neoliberalism”. Review of International Political Economy, 28 (6), pp. 1487-1508. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1786435.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet