Ley 4/2023, de 28 de febrero, para la igualdad real y efectiva de las personas trans y para la garantía de los derechos de las personas LGTBI: ¿El consentimiento debe estar siempre en el centro?

  1. Sonia Calaza López coord. 1
  2. Roncesvalles Barber Cárcamo 2
  3. Adán Carrizo González-Castell 3
  4. Guillermo Cerdeira Bravo de Mansilla 4
  5. Marina Exchevarría Saenz 5
  6. Pablo Gutiérrez de Cabiedes 6
  7. Eva María Martínez Gallego 7
  8. Blanca Rodríguez Ruiz 4
  9. José Luis Sariego Morillo 8
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad de La Rioja
    info

    Universidad de La Rioja

    Logroño, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0553yr311

  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

  4. 4 Universidad de Sevilla
    info

    Universidad de Sevilla

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03yxnpp24

  5. 5 Universidad de Valladolid
    info

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Valladolid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01fvbaw18

  6. 6 Universidad CEU San Pablo
    info

    Universidad CEU San Pablo

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00tvate34

  7. 7 Universidad de Salamanca; Magistrada del Juzgado de Primera Instancia n.o 8 de Salamanca
  8. 8 Abogado
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Actualidad civil
  1. O'Callaghan Muñoz, Xavier (dir.)

ISSN: 0213-7100

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 7-8

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Actualidad civil

Abstract

The great relevance of Law 4/2023, of February 28, for the real and effective equality of trans people and for the guarantee of the rights of LGTBI people encourages us to open a Debate with great specialists who can offer a luminous answer to the following questions: Is the LGTBI community duly represented by lesbians, gays, transsexuals, bisexuals and intersex people or perhaps it should have been called LGTBI+ because someone with a different identity is missing from this list? determined sexuality that must also fit into the designated group? Do you think the legal recognition of voluntary «gender self-determination» is correct, in the Registry, without conditions or prior health, medical or assistance requirements, for the elderly —without conditions— and for minors under certain conditions —under the age of twelve? and fourteen years with judicial authorization and minors between fourteen and sixteen years accompanied by their parents and guardians—? Does the legal treatment of the sexual health of intersex people seem appropriate, with authorization, to all people and also to minors between twelve and sixteen years of age, to face practices of «gender reassignment» with genital modification provided that, due to their age and maturity, can they consent in an informed manner to its performance? In short: should consent always be at the center?

Data source: Dialnet