El acceso abierto y el futuro de la filosofía en España

  1. Ramón A. Feenstra 1
  2. David Teira 2
  1. 1 Universitat Jaume I
    info

    Universitat Jaume I

    Castelló de la Plana, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02ws1xc11

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Revista:
Revista de Hispanismo Filosófico

ISSN: 1136-8071

Any de publicació: 2023

Número: 28

Pàgines: 121-135

Tipus: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Revista de Hispanismo Filosófico

Resum

During the 2010s, a radical transformation took place in the Spanish philosophical landscape: most philosophy journals started releasing their papers for free under a creative commons licence. Thanks to open access publication, Spanish philosophy has a bigger audience today than never before. Drawing on the authors’ experience as editors of two of these journals, Theoria and Recerca, this paper discusses what made this transformation possible, its consequences for the assessment of the Spanish philosophical output and, finally, how to strengthen Spanish philosophy journals to confront the forthcoming challenges in open access publishing.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • Alonso-Arévalo, J., Saraiva, R., y Flórez-Holguín, R., “Revistas depredadoras: fraude en la ciencia”, en Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, n. 31 (2020), pp. 1-6.
  • Araiza Díaz, V., Ramírez Godoy, M. E., y Díaz Escoto, A. S, “El Open Access a debate: entre el pago por publicar y la apertura radical sostenible”, en Investigación bibliotecológica, n. 33(80), (2019), pp. 195-216. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.80.58039
  • Beall J., “Predatory publishers are corrupting open access”, en Nature, n. 489, (2012), 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a
  • BJÖRK B. C., “Gold, green, and black open access”, en Learned Publishing, n. 30, (2017), pp. 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096
  • Borrego, Á., Anglada, L., y Abadal, E., “Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access?”, en Learned Publishing, 34(2), (2021), pp. 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1347
  • Delgado López-Cózar, E., Feenstra, R.A., y Pallarés-Domínguez, D., “Investigación en Ética y Filosofía en España. Hábitos, prácticas y percepciones sobre comunicación, evaluación y ética de la publicación científica”. Asociación Española de Ética y Filosofía Política, Sociedad Académica de Filosofía, Red Española de Filosofía, Castellón, 8 de octubre de 2020. Disponible en: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/ handle/10234/189924
  • Feenstra, R. A., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. “The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spanish philosophical scholarship: an analysis of researchers perceptions”. (2021), arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11987.
  • Feenstra, R. A., y López-Cózar, E. D. “Philosophers’ perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma”, en Learned Publishing, (2021). pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1426
  • Gadagkar, R., “The ‘pay-to-publish’ model should be abolished. Notes and Records”, en Royal Society Journal of the History of Science, n. 70(4), (2016), pp. 403-404. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0039
  • Hammarfelt, B. “Four claims on research assessment and metric use in the humanities”, Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, núm. 43, (2017), pp. 33-38. doi: 10.1002/bul2.2017.1720430508
  • Hammarfelt, B., y Haddow, G. “Conflicting measures and values: How humanities scholars in Australia and Sweden use and react to bibliometric indicators”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, núm. 69 (2018), 924-935. doi: 10.1002/asi.24043.
  • Leopold, S.S. “Paying to Publish — What is Open Access and Why is it Important?”, en Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, n. 472, (2014), pp. 1665–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014- 3615-9
  • Schroter, S., y Tite, L., “Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions” en Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(3), (2006), pp. 141- 148. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900316
  • Shehata, A. M. K., y Elgllab, M. F. M., “Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap”, en Learned Publishing, 31(3), (2018), pp. 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167
  • Teixeira Da Silva, J. A. y Yamada, Y., “Accelerated Peer Review and Paper Processing Models in Academic Publishing”, en Publishing Research Quarterly, (2022). 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109- 022-09891-4
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet