Indicadores de bienestar subjetivo y sus determinantes socioeconómicosun estudio para la sociedad española

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Argyle, M. (2009). The psychology of happiness, Routledge, London, 2ª ed.
• Barrington-Leigh, C.P. (2024). “The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?” Journal of Public Economics, 230
• Bericat, E. (2018). Excluidos de la felicidad: la estratificación emocional del bienestar en España, Madrid, CIS.
• Blanchflower, D.; Graham, C. and Piper, A. (2023). “Happiness and age, resolving the debate”, National Institute Economic Review, 1–18
• Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Powdthavee, N. (2013). “Is personality fixed? Personality changes as much as “variable” economic factors and more strongly predicts changes to life satisfaction”, Social Indicators Research, 111, 287–305.
• OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being, OECD Publishing.
• Clingingsmith (2016). “Negative Emotions, Income, and Welfare: Casual Estimates from the PSID” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 130, 1-19.
• Deaton, A. (2010). “Income, aging, health and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll”, in D.A. Wise (ed.), Research Findings in the Economics of Aging, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235-263.
• Dell Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T. and Wissing, M. (2011). “The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings”, Social Indicators Research 100(2):185-207.
• Diener, E. (2000). “Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index” American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
• Diener, E., M. Diener and C. Diener (1995). “Factors predicting the subjective wellbeing of nations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, pp. 851-864.
• Diener, E., R. Inglehart and L. Tay (2012). “Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales”, Social Indicators Research, 112, pp. 497-527.
• Diener, E., D. Kahneman, R. Arora, J. Harter and W. Tov (2009). “Income’s differential influence on judgements of life versus affective well-being”, in E. Diener (ed.), Assessing Well-Being: The collected works of Ed Diener, Social Indicators Research Vol. 39, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 247-266.
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New measures of well-being: Flourishing, positive, and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266.
• Diener, E. and W. Tov (2012). “National Accounts of Well-Being”, in K.C. Land, A.C. Michalos and M.J. Sirgy (eds.), Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research, Springer: Dordrecht.
• Dolan, P. and R. Metcalfe (2011). “Comparing measures of subjective well-being and views about the role they should play in policy”, UK Office for National Statistics Paper, July.
• Dolan, P., T. Peasgood and M. White (2007). “Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective wellbeing”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, pp. 94-122.
• Dolan, P. and M.P. White (2007). “How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform policy?” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), pp. 71-85.
• Easterlin, R.A. (1974). “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”, in David, P.A. and M.W. Reder, Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz, New York, Academic Press Inc, pp. 89-125.
• Easterlin, R.A. (2005). “Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: A reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven”, Social Indicators Research, 74(3), pp. 429-433.
• Fabian M (2020). “The coalescence of being: a model of the self-actualisation process”. J Happiness Stud. 21 (4) pp. 1487-1508.
• Fredrickson, B. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build, Advances in experimental social psychology, Elsevier.
• Frey, B.S. and A. Stutzer (2002). “What can economists learn from happiness research?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), pp. 402-435.
• Frijters, P. and Krekel, C., (2021). A Handbook for Wellbeing Policy-Making: History, Theory, Measurement, Implementation, and Examples. Oxford University Press,
• Graham C (2009). Happiness around the world: the paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford University Press, Oxford
• Graham C, Nikolova M (2015). “Bentham or Aristotle in the development process? An empirical investigation of capabilities and subjective well-being”. World Dev 68:163–179
• Graham, C., & Lora, E. (Eds.). (2009). Paradox and Perception: Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America. Brookings Institution Press.
• Halpern, D. (2010). The hidden Wealth of Nations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Henderson, Luke Wayne and Knight, Tess (2012). “Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing”, International journal of wellbeing, 2, 3, pp. 196-221.
• Hirschauer, N., Lehberger, M. Musshoff, O. (2014). Happiness and Utility in Economic Thought—Or: What Can We Learn from Happiness Research for Public Policy Analysis and Public Policy Making? Social Indicators Research 121(3) 647-674.
• Howell RT, y Howell CJ. (2008). “The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: a meta-analysis”. Psychol Bull. 134(4):536-60.
• Hudson NW, Lucas RE, Donnellan MB, Kushlev K. (2016). “Income reliably predicts daily sadness, but not happiness: A replication and extension of Kushlev, Dunn, & Lucas (2015)”. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 7(8):828-836.
• Iglesias-Vázquez, E., Pena-López, A. y Sánchez-Santos, J.M. (2013). Bienestar subjetivo, renta y bienes relacionales: Los determinantes de la felicidad en España, Revista internacional de sociología, Vol.71, nº 3, Septiembre-Diciembre, 567-592
• Iglesias de Ussel, J., de Juan Díaz, R. (coords.) (2017). La felicidad de los españoles, Madrid, Tecnos.
• Kahneman, D. (1999), “Objective happiness”, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology, pp. 3-25, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
• Kahneman, D. and A. Deaton (2010). “High income improves life evaluation but not emotional well-being”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 207(38), pp. 16489-16493.
• Kahneman, D. and A.B. Krueger (2006). “Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), pp. 3-24.
• Kahneman, D., A.B. Kreuger, D. Schkade, N. Schwartz and A. Stone (2004). “Towards National Well-Being Accounts”, The American Economic Review, 94(2), pp. 429- 434.
• Kapteyn, Arie, (2020). “Income growth is unlikely to help, but we can learn from international comparisons,” Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), pages 188-197, July.
• Kapteyn A, Lee J, Tassot C, Vonkova H, Zamarro G (2015). “Dimensions of subjective well-being” Soc Indic Res 123(3), pp. 625–660
• Kapteyn, A., J.P. Smith and A. van Soest (2009). “Comparing Life Satisfaction”, RAND Labor and Population Working Paper Series, RAND and IZA
• Kushlev K, Dunn EW, Lucas RE. (2015). “Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness”. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2015; 6:483–489
• Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, London: Penguin Books.
• Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel, E., Ozer, D.J., Lyubomirsky, S., (2020). Empirical relationships among five types of well-being. In: Lee, M., Kubzansky, L.D., VanderWeele, T.J. (Eds.), Measuring Well-being: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Oxford University Press.
• Nikolova, Milena & Graham, Carol, (2020). “The Economics of Happiness,” GLO Discussion Paper Series 640, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
• O’Donnell G, Oswald AJ (2015). “National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings”. Ecol Econ 120:59–70.
• Peiró, A. (2004). “Condiciones socioeconómicas y felicidad de los españoles”, ICE, julio-agosto, 179-194.
• Peiró, A. (2006). “Happiness, satisfaction and socio-economic conditions: some international evidence”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35,348-365.
• Pena-López, A.; Rungo, P. and López-Bermúdez, B. (2021). “The “Efficiency” Effect of Conceptual Referent son the Generation of Happiness: A Cross-National Analysis” Journal of Happiness Studies (2021) 22:2457–2483
• Pena-López, A. y Sánchez-Santos, J.M. (2017). Ocupación, desempleo y felicidad en Iglesias de Ussel, J., de Juan Díaz, R. (coords.) La felicidad de los españoles, Madrid, Tecnos.
• Pena-López, A. y Sánchez-Santos, J.M. (2016). Individual social capital and subjective wellbeing: the relational goods, Journal of happiness studies, 1-21.
• Rodríguez-Hernández, G. (2019). “The eudemonic and hedonic role of happiness in a population with high levels of life satisfaction” International journal of Social Psychology, 34 (2), 230-255.
• Rojas, M. (2006). “Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: is it a simple relationship?” Journal of Happiness Studies, 7 (4), 467-497.
• Russell, J.A. (2003). “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion” Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Shiffman, S A., A. Stone, and M.R. Hufford (2008). Ecological Momentary Assessment Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4:1-32
• Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris.
• Stone AA, Mackie CE (2013). Subjective well-being: measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
• Stutzer, A. and Frey. B. (2004). “Reported Subjective Well-Being: A Challenge for Economic Theory and Economic Policy” Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 124 (2),pp. 191-231
• Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Seligman M., Csikszentmihalyi M, eds. (2000). Special issue on happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning. Am Psychol ;55:5-183.
• Tay, L., Chan, D. and Diener, E. (2014). “The Metrics of Societal Happiness”, Soc Indic Res (2014) 117:577–600 DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0356-1
• Van Praag BMS, Ferrer-i-Carbonell A (2008). Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach, Revised edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
• Veehoven, R. (2000). “The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life” Journal of Happiness Studies vol. 1, pp 1-39
• Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). “The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation”. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41–79.
• White, M.P. and P. Dolan (2009). “Accounting for the richness of daily activities”, Psychological Science, 20(8), pp. 1000-1008.