¿Cómo mide el riesgo el observador imparcial?

  1. Antonio J. Heras 1
  2. David Teira 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info
    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02p0gd045

    Geografischer Standort der Organisation Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info
    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

    Geografischer Standort der Organisation Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Zeitschrift:
Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

ISSN: 0011-1503

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Ausgabe: 47

Nummer: 139

Seiten: 47-65

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2015.525 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Andere Publikationen in: Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

We study the link between the concepts of risk and equality in the argument of the impartial observer. The conception of justice that this latter would choose is grounded on the purity of the choice procedure. However, if we model this choice using the standard risk measurements in mathematical finance, there is an implicit preference for the degree of inequality that the chosen outcome will yield. This should make us reconsider the neutrality of the impartial observer’s proceduralism.