¿Cómo mide el riesgo el observador imparcial?

  1. Antonio J. Heras 1
  2. David Teira 2
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info
    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02p0gd045

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info
    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Journal:
Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

ISSN: 0011-1503

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 47

Issue: 139

Pages: 47-65

Type: Article

DOI: 10.22201/IIFS.18704905E.2015.525 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Crítica: revista hispanoamericana de filosofía

Abstract

We study the link between the concepts of risk and equality in the argument of the impartial observer. The conception of justice that this latter would choose is grounded on the purity of the choice procedure. However, if we model this choice using the standard risk measurements in mathematical finance, there is an implicit preference for the degree of inequality that the chosen outcome will yield. This should make us reconsider the neutrality of the impartial observer’s proceduralism.