Detección del DIF en ítems politómicos mediante el uso de los métodos Mantel-Haenszel

  1. Fidalgo Aliste, Ángel Manuel 1
  2. Quintanilla Cobián, Laura 2
  3. Fernández, Rubén 3
  4. Pons, Francisco 4
  5. Aguerri, María Ester 5
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  3. 3 Universidad de Almería
    info

    Universidad de Almería

    Almería, España

    ROR https://ror.org/003d3xx08

  4. 4 University of Oslo
    info

    University of Oslo

    Oslo, Noruega

    ROR https://ror.org/01xtthb56

  5. 5 Universidad de Buenos Aires
    info

    Universidad de Buenos Aires

    Buenos Aires, Argentina

    ROR https://ror.org/0081fs513

Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
REMA

ISSN: 1135-6855

Argitalpen urtea: 2010

Alea: 15

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 12-18

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: REMA

Laburpena

Mantel-Haenszel (MH) methods constitute one of the most popular non-parametric differential item functioning (DIF) detection procedures, and have been applied for detecting DIF in both dichotomous and polytomous items. To date, the statistics used for assessing DIF has been the MH chi-square statistic, the generalized Mantel-Haenszel test and the Mantel test, although they limit the analysis to two groups. This article analyses which MH statistics permits DIF assessment in multiple groups and polytomous items.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • 1. Elosua, P. y López-Jáuregui, A. (2007). Aplicación de cuatro procedimientos de detección del funcionamiento diferencial sobre ítems politómicos. Psicothema, 19, 329-336.
  • 2. Fidalgo, A.M. (1996). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems. En J. Muñiz (Ed.),Psicometría (págs. 371-455). Madrid : Universitas.
  • 3. Fidalgo, A. M. (2005). Mantel-Haenszel Methods. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.),Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (Vol.3, pp. 1120-1126). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 4. Fidalgo, A.M., y Madeira, J.M. (2008). Generalized Mantel-Haenszel methods for DIF detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 940-958.
  • 5. Fidalgo, A.M., y Scalon, J.D. (2010). Using Generalized Mantel-Haenszel Statistics to Assess DIF among Multiple Groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 60-69.
  • 6. Fidalgo, A.M., Bartram, D., Quintanilla, L., Fernández, R., y Pons, F. (2008, July). Effect of the choice of scores assigned to the response variable on the Mantel test. In A. M. Fidalgo & P. Elosua (Chairs), Mantel-Haenszel methods for DIF detection. Symposium conducted at the III European Congress of Methodology, Oviedo, Spain.
  • 7. Hidalgo, M.D., y Gómez, J. (1999). Técnicas de detección de funcionamiento diferencial en ítems politómicos. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 1, 39-60.
  • 8. Holland, W. P., y Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer & H. I. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp.129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • 9. Landis, J. R., Heyman, E. R., y Koch, G. G. (1978). Average partial association in three-way contingency tables: A review and discussion of alternative tests. International Statistical Review, 46, 237-254.
  • 10. Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; extension of the MantelHaenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690-700.
  • 11. Mantel, N., y Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.
  • 12. Zwick, R., Donoghue, J. R., y Grima, A. (1993). Assessment of differential item functioning for performance tasks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 233-251.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet