Las reacciones de terceras partes ante la injusticia organizacional

  1. Topa Cantisano, Gabriela
  2. Moriano León, Juan Antonio
  3. Morales Domínguez, José Francisco
Revista:
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Año de publicación: 2009

Volumen: 9

Número: 1

Páginas: 79-88

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

Resumen

To date, theory and research on organizational justice has focused on the victim�s perspective, and the third party�s perspective has received little systematic attention. In this study a model proposed by Skarlicki and Kulik (2005) on third-party reactions to employee mistreatment has been applied. Data were obtained from a sample (N= 586) of officers into the Spanish Army via a mailed survey regarding their perceptions of organizational unfulfilment of promises made during the professional soldiers� recruitment campaign. Structural equation modelling was used and results showed that organizational unfulfilment of promises, employee performance and employee organizational commitment explained internal attributions blaming the organization. Moreover, collaborative organizational culture and internal attributions accounted a great percentage of variance in supervisors� perceptions regarding organizational unfairness.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bies R (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. En LL Cummings y B Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289- 319). Greenwich: JAI Press.
  • Bies RJ y Moag JF (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. En R Lewicki, B Shepard y M Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotions in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43- 55). Greenwich: JAI Press.
  • Brockner J, Wiesenfeld B, Stephan J, Hurley R, et al. (1997). The effects on layoff survivors of their fellow survivors’ reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 835-863.
  • Colquitt J, Conlon D, Wesson M, Porter C y Ng K (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
  • Deutsch M (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
  • Donovan MA, Drasgow F y Munson LJ (1998). The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 683-692.
  • Farrell D (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 596-607.
  • Folger R y Skarlicki D (1997). Retaliation in the Workplace: the roles of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
  • Giacalone R y Greenberg J (1997). Antisocial Behavior in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gonsalkorale K, Carlisle K y von Hippel W (2007). Intergroup threat increases implicit stereotyping. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7, 189-200.
  • Greenberg J (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
  • Leung A, Chiu W y Au Y (1993). Sympathy and support for industrial actions: A justice analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 781-787.
  • Miceli M y Near J (1992). Blowing the whistle. Lexingtong, MA: Lexintong Books.
  • Minton S y O’Moore, A. (2008). The effectiveness of a Nationwide Intervention Programme to prevent and counter School Bullying in Ireland. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 1-12.
  • Moorman R (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and OCB: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
  • Otero J, Santiago M, Godás A, Castro C, Villardefrancos E y Ponte D (2008). An integrative approach to burnout in Secondary School Teachers: examining the role of student disruptive behavior and disciplinary issues. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 259-270.
  • Ruf B, Muralidhar K, Brown R, Janney J y Paul K (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 143-156.
  • Sánchez García JC y Alonso Amo E (2004). Acuerdo intragrupal: una aplicación a la evaluación de la cultura de los equipos de trabajo. Psicothema, 16, 88-93.
  • Skarlicki D, Ellard J y Kelln B (1998). Third-party perceptions of a layoff: Procedural derogation, andretributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
  • Skarlicki DP y Kulik CT (2005). Thirdparty reactions to employee (mis)treatment: a justice perspective. En B Staw y R Kramer (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: an annual series of annalytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 26, pp. 183-229). Amsterdam: Jai Press.
  • Smith, PB y Peterson MF (1988). Leadership, organizations and culture: An event management model. London: Sage.
  • Topa, G, Depolo M y Morales JF (2007). Acoso laboral: meta-análisis y modelo integrador de sus antecedentes y consecuencias. Psicothema, 19, 88-94.
  • Tyler TR y Blader SL (2000). Cooperation in Groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Tyler TR y Smith HJ (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D Gilbert, ST Fiske y G Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4ª ed., pp. 595-629). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
  • Van Knippenberg D y van Schie EC (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet