Liderazgo auténtico. Concepto y validación del cuestionario ALQ en España

  1. Moriano León, Juan Antonio
  2. Molero Alonso, Fernando
  3. Lévy Mangin, Jean Pierre
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 23

Número: 2

Páginas: 336-341

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

En este estudio se describe el concepto de liderazgo auténtico y la validación de un cuestionario para medirlo en una muestra de más de 600 empleados españoles. Este cuestionario mide cuatro componentes diferentes, aunque relacionados entre sí, del concepto más amplio de liderazgo auténtico. Estos componentes son conciencia de sí mismo, transparencia en las relaciones, procesamiento equilibrado y moral internalizada. Los resultados obtenidos a través del modelado de ecuaciones estructurales confi rmaron que la versión española del cuestionario presenta una alta fi abilidad y validez concurrente para una serie de variables asociadas al liderazgo como son la efectividad percibida del líder, el esfuerzo extra de los seguidores y la satisfacción con el líder.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Avolio, B.J., y Gardner, W.L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.
  • Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., y May, D.R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
  • Bagozzi, R.P., y Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815-824.
  • Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
  • Bass, B.M., y Avolio, B.J. (2000). MLQ-Multi-factor leadership questionnaire, technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
  • Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C.E., Guilermin, F., y Bosi Ferraz, M. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-reports measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
  • Bracken, B.A., y Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12(1-2), 119-132.
  • Brown, M.E., Treviño, L.K., y Harrison, D.A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
  • Caza, A., Bagozzi, R.P., Woolley, L., Levy, L., y Caza, B.B. (2010). Psychological capital and authentic leadership: Measurement, gender and cultural extension. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2, 53-70.
  • Clapp-Smith, R., Vogelgesang, G.R., y Avey, J.B. (2009). Authentic leadership and positive psychological capital: The mediating role of trust at the group level of analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(3), 227-240.
  • Cortina, J.M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
  • Fornell, C., y Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., y Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., y Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
  • Hu, L.-T. y Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Jensen, S.M., y Luthans, F. (2006). Entrepreneurs as authentic leaders: Impact on employees' attitudes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(8), 646-666.
  • Lévy-Mangin, J.P., y Varela, J. (2006). Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales. La Coruña: Netbiblo.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695-706.
  • Luthans, F., y Avolio, B.J. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. En K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton y R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 241-261). San Francisco Berrett-Koehler.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Avey, J.B., y Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
  • May, D.R., Chan, A.Y.L., Hodges, T.D., y Avolio, B.J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 247-260.
  • Messick, S. (1989). Validity. En R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
  • Molero, F., Recio, P., y Cuadrado, I. (2010). Liderazgo transformacional y liderazgo transaccional: un análisis de la estructura factorial del Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) en una muestra española. Psicothema, 22(3), 495-501.
  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Seligman, M.E.P., y Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
  • Shamir, B., y Eilam, G. (2005). «What's your story?» A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395-417.
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Wernsing, T.S. y Peterson, S.J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., y Oke, A. (2009). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/job.653.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet