Organizational injusticethird parties' reactions to mistreatment of employee

  1. Topa Cantisano, Gabriela
  2. Moriano León, Juan Antonio
  3. José F. Morales
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 25

Número: 2

Páginas: 214-221

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: la investigación sobre la justicia organizacional se ha centrado en la perspectiva de la víctima. En este estudio intenta contribuir en la comprensión de la perspectiva de las terceras partes comprobando empíricamente un modelo que describe las reacciones de la tercera parte ante el maltrato de los empleados. Método: los datos fueron obtenidos de una muestra (N= 334) de empleados españoles de diversas organizaciones, incluidos en 66 grupos de trabajo, a través de una encuesta relativa a sus percepciones maltrato organizacional. Se usó el modelado de ecuaciones estructurales para analizar los datos. Resultados: el modelo propuesto tuvo un ajuste limitado a los datos y fue re-especificado. El maltrato organizacional, el rendimiento del empleado y el compromiso organizacional explicaban las atribuciones culpando a la organización. Más aún, la identificación organizacional del observador influía positivamente sobre la atribución de responsabilidad hacia fuera de la organización. Además el clima organizacional de apoyo y las atribuciones internas daban cuenta de un importante porcentaje de la varianza en las percepciones de los compañeros sobre la injusticia organizacional. Conclusiones: el modelo final explica las percepciones de injusticia a través de las atribuciones internas de responsabilidad en relación con el maltrato organizacional a los empleados.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  • Barclay, L., Skarlicki, D., & Pugh, D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629-643.
  • Brockner, J., Spreitzer, G., Mishra, A., Hochwarter, W., Pepper, L., & Weinberg, J. (2004). Perceived control as an antidote to the negative effects of layoffs on survivors' organizational commitment and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 76-100.
  • Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives of what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298-310.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
  • Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
  • Cremer, D.D., & Hiel, A.V. (2006). Effects of another person's fair treatment on one's own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 231-249. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.002.
  • Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z., Bobocel, D., & Rupp, D. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
  • Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2005). Self-interest: Deffning and understanding a human motive. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 985-991.
  • Donovan, M., Drasgow, F., & Munson, L.J. (1998). The Perceptions of Fair Interpersonal Treatment Scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 683-692.
  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
  • Giacalone, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Antisocial behavior in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Harlos, K., & Axelrod, L. (2005). Investigating Hospital Administrators' Experiences of workplace mistreatment. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37(4), 262-272.
  • Harlos, K., & Pinder, C. (1999). Patterns of organizational injustice: A taxonomy of what employees regard as unjust. In J. Wagner (Ed.), Advances in qualitative organizational research (Vol. 2, pp. 97-125). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Harlos, K., & Pinder, C. (2000). Emotion and injustice in the workplace. In S. Fineman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 255-276). London: Sage.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fft indexes in covariance structure analysis conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
  • Huo, Y., Smith, H., Tyler, T., & Lind, E. (1996). Superordinate identiffcation, subgroup identiffcation, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem, is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
  • Jones, E.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown: General Learning Press.
  • Kelloway, K., Francis, L., Catano, V., & Dupré, K. (2008). Third-party support for strike action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 806-817.
  • Leung, A., Chiu, W., & Au, Y. (1993). Sympathy and support for industrial actions: A justice analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 781-787.
  • Low, D., Schneider, K., Radhakrishnan, P., & Rounds, J. (2007). The experience of bystanders of workplace ethnic harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2261-2297.
  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identiffcation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • Malle, B.F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 895.
  • Mañas, M., González Romá, V., & Peiró, J.M. (1999). El clima de los equipos de trabajo. Determinantes y consecuencias [The climate of work teams. Determinants and consequents]. University of Almería (Spain): Instituto de Estudios Almerienses.
  • Meyer, J., & Allen, N. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
  • Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1992). Blowing the whistle. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Skarlicki, D.P., Barclay, L., & Pugh, D. (2008). When explanations for layoffs are not enough: Employer's integrity as a moderator of the relationships between informational justice and retaliation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 123-146.
  • Skarlicki, D.P., & Kulik, C.T. (2004). Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 183-229. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26005-1.
  • Skarlicki, D.P., & Latham, G.P. (2006). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 617-633.
  • Skarlicki, D.P., & Rupp, D.E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 944-952.
  • Topa, G., Moriano, J., & Morales, J.F. (2009). Las reacciones de terceras partes ante la injusticia organizacional [Third-party reactions to organizational unfairness]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9(1), 79-88.
  • Weiner, B. (1989). Human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Zhu, L., Martens, J., & Aquino, K. (2012). Third party responses to justice failure: An identity-based meaning maintenance model. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 129-151.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet