Influential factors in the choice of public transportation or cars as the mode of transportation in habitual commutes

  1. López Sáez, Mercedes
  2. Lois García, David
  3. Fernández Sedano, Itziar
  4. Martínez Rubio, José Luis
Journal:
International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

ISSN: 0213-4748,  1579-3680

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 29

Issue: 2

Pages: 371-399

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2014.918826 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social

Abstract

The goal of this study is to analyse the differences in attitudes towards habitual modes of transportation among users of public and private transportation. The explanatory capacity of attitudes when determining the mode choice, along with the structural and sociodemographic factors, are also verified. The study was performed in three Spanish cities with 742 participants. The results revealed that cars are better rated than public modes of transportation in the attributes associated with immediate advantages (i.e., speed and availability) and convenience. Subways are highly rated in both immediate and deferred advantages (environment, safety, cost and health). Buses are the mode rated the lowest of the three. Using logistic regression, it was verified that the variance explained by a model that includes attitudes (R2 = .639) is higher than the variance explained by a model based solely on variables related to infrastructures (R2 = .489). The discussion of these results includes proposals aimed at decreasing car use.

€ View funding

Funding information

This study was financed by the Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas (CEDEX), Ministerio de Fomento (Ministry of Public Works). Project reference: PT-2007-011-061APP./Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas (CEDEX), Ministerio de Fomento. Referencia del proyecto: PT-2007-011-061APP.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit and information use in travel mode choices. Acta Psychologica, 96, 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00008-5
  • Anable, J., & Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 163–181.
  • Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality or habit?: Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment & Behavior, 35, 264–285. doi:10.1177/0013916502250134
  • Beirão, G., & Sarsfield-Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14, 478–489. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009
  • Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Affective-symbolic and instrumental-independence psychological motives mediating effects of socio-demographic variables on daily car use. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 33–38. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.11.006
  • Comisión Europea (2007). Towards a new culture for urban mobility. Directorate General for Energy and Transport. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52007DC0551:EN:HTML:NOT
  • Comisión Europea (2009). A sustainable future for transport: Towards an integrated, technology-led and user-friendly system. Directorate General for Energy and Transport. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/publications/doc/2009_future_of_transport_en.pdf
  • Cools, M., Moons, E., Janssens, B., & Wets, G. (2009). Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: Profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation, 36, 437–453. doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9206-z
  • Domarchi, C., Tudela, A., & González, A. (2008). Effect of attitudes, habit and affective appraisal on mode choice: An application to university workers. Transportation, 35, 585–599. doi:10.1007/s11116-008-9168-6
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Gardner, B. (2009). Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2008.08.001
  • Gärling, T., & Steg, L. (2007). Introductory chapter. In T. Gärling & L. Steg, (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 1–7). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Gatersleben, B. (2007). Affective and symbolic aspects of car use. In T. Gärling & L. Steg, (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 219–233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Huey, J. A., & Everett, P. B. (1996). Immediate benefits: The reason for the Car’s success and Transit’s failure. Transportation Research Record, 1521, 65–70. doi:10.3141/1521-09
  • Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Grischkat, S., & Böhler, S. (2007). Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 277–292. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.001
  • Jakobsson, C. (2007). Instrumental motives for private car use. In T. Gärling, & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 205–218). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Linares, C., & Díaz, J. (2010). Short-term effect of concentrations of fine particulate matter on hospital admissions due to cardiovascular and respiratory causes among the over-75 age group in Madrid, Spain. Public Health, 124, 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2009.11.007
  • Lois, D., & López-Sáez, M. (2009). The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: A structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 790–799.
  • Ministerio de Fomento. (2008). Encuesta de movilidad de las personas residentes en España. Movilia 2006/2007. Retrieved from http://www.fomento.es/MFOM/LANG_CASTELLANO/ESTADISTICAS_Y_PUBLICACIONES/INFORMACION_ESTADISTICA/Movilidad/Movilia2006_2007/
  • Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A, 35, 695–719.
  • Moreno, M., Ruiz, J. P., & Corraliza, J. A. (2007). Dilemas sociales y transporte urbano. Revista de Psicología Social, 22, 255–266. doi:10.1174/021347407782194380
  • Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 147–162.
  • Van Wee, B., Holwerda, H., & Van Baren, R. (2002). Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour. The relevance of land-use impacts on mobility. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2, 305–316.
  • Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., & Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.005
Data source: Dialnet