Authentic leadership, group cohesion and group identification in security and emergency teams

  1. García-Guiu López, Carlos María
  2. Molero Alonso, Fernando
  3. Moya Morales, Miguel C.
  4. Moriano León, Juan Antonio
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 27

Número: 1

Páginas: 59-64

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Background: Authentic leadership (AL) is a kind of leadership that inspires and promotes positive psychological capacities, underlining the moral and ethical component of behavior. The proposed investigation studies the relations among AL, cohesion, and group identification in security and emergency teams. Method: A cross-sectional research design was conducted in which participated 221 members from 26 fire departments and operative teams from the local police of three Spanish provinces. The following questionnaires were administered: Authentic Leadership (ALQ), Group Cohesion (GEQ), and Mael and Ashford's Group Identification Questionnaire. Results: A direct and positive relation was found between AL, cohesion, and group identification. An indirect relation was also found between AL and group cohesion through group identification, indicating the existence of partial mediation. Conclusions: The utility of the proposed model based on AL is considered; this model can be employed by those in charge of the fire departments and operative groups in organizations to improve workteams' cohesion. Both AL and group identification help to explain group cohesion in organizations committed to security and emergencies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Álvarez, O., Lila, M., & Castillo, I. (2012). Los estilos de liderazgo de la Policía Local de la Comunidad Valenciana: una aproximación desde la Teoría del Liderazgo Transformacional [The leadership styles of the local police of the Valencian community: An approach from the Theory of Transformational Leadership]. Anales de Psicología, 28(2), 548-557.
  • Arnatt, M.J., & Beyerlein, M.M. (2014). An empirical examination of special operations team leaders’ and members’ leadership characteristics. Policing, 37(2), 438-453.
  • Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  • Avolio, B.J., & Gardner, W.L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315-338.
  • Avolio B.J., Gardner W.L., Walumbwa F.O., Luthans F., & May, D.R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviours. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 801-823.
  • Azanza, G., Moriano, J.A., & Molero, F. (2013). Authentic leadership and organizational culture as drivers of employees’ job satisfaction. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 29(2), 45-50.
  • Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Bass, B.M, Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I., & Yair, B. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207-218.
  • Beal, D.J., Cohen, R.R., Burke, M.J., & McLendon, C.L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004.
  • Carmines, E.G., & Zeller, R.A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Carron, A.V., Brawley, R.L., & Widmeyer, W.N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J.L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
  • Carron, A., Widmeyer, W.N., & Brawley, L.R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
  • Cepeda, G., & Roldán, J. (2008). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas [Applying the PLS technique in practice in business administration]. University of Seville. Retrieved at: ciberconta.unizar.es/doctorado/PLSGabrielCepeda.pdf.
  • Ceri-Booms, M. (2010). An empirical study on transactional and authentic leaders: Exploring the mediating role of trust in leader on organizational identification. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14(2), 235-243.
  • Ceri-Booms, M (2012). How can authentic leaders create organizational identification? An empirical study on Turkish employees. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 172-190.
  • Chin, W.W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), VII-XVI.
  • Espósito, V., Chin, W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Editorial: Perspectives on partial least squares. In V. Espósito, W. Chin, J.H. Henseler & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields (pp. 1-20). Berlin: Springer.
  • Falk, R.F., & Miller, N.B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, Ohio: The University of Akron Press.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Gardner, W.L., Cogliser, C.C., Davis, K.M., & Dickens, M.P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1120-1145.
  • Gully, S.M., Devine, D.J., & Whitney, D.J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497-520.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., & Platow, M.J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
  • Henseler, J., & Chin, W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(1), 82-109.
  • Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
  • Houchin, G. (2011). Authentic leadership in sports teams. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 40. Retrieved at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/870031125?accounti d=14609. (870031125).
  • Iturbide, L., Elosua, P., & Yanes, F. (2010). Medida de la cohesión en equipos deportivos. Adaptación al español del Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) [Measure of cohesion in sports teams. Adaptation to Spanish of the Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ)]. Psicothema, 22(3), 482-488.
  • James, L.B., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
  • Knouse, S.B. (2007). Building task cohesion to bring teams together. Quality Progress, 40(3), 49-53.
  • Lisbona, A. (2010). Teoría de la identidad social y algunas aplicaciones actuales [Theory of social identity and some current applications]. Revista de Psicología Social, 25(2), 185-188.
  • Lisbona, A., Morales, J.F., & Palací, F.J. (2006). Identidad y compromiso en equipos de intervención en emergencias [Identity and commitment in emergency intervention teams]. Psicothema, 18(3), 407-412.
  • Mael, F.A., & Ashforth, B.E. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
  • Moriano, J.A., Molero, F., & Lévy Mangin, J.P. (2011). Liderazgo auténtico. Concepto y validación del cuestionario ALQ en España [Authentic Leadership. Concept and validation of the ALQ questionnaire in Spain]. Psicothema, 23, 336-341.
  • Oliver, L.W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S.H., & Pandhi, N.A. (1999). A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. Military Psychology, 11(1), 57-83.
  • Pillai, R., & Willaims, E.A. (2004). Transformational leadership, selfefficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 144-159.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
  • Reicher, S.D., Haslam, S.A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568.
  • Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). Lexander SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). SmartPLS. Hamburg, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de.
  • Ruiz, M.A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales [Structural equation models]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.
  • Scandroglio, B., López, J.S., & San José, M.C. (2008). La teoría de la identidad social: una síntesis crítica de sus fundamentos, evidencias y controversias [The theory of social identity: A critical synthesis of its foundations, evidence, and controversies]. Psicothema, 20(1), 80-89.
  • Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Brainin, E., & Popper, M. (2000). Leadership and social identification in military units: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 612-640.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Topa, G., & Morales, F. (2006). Identificación organizacional y proactividad personal en grupos de trabajo: un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales [Organizational identification and personal proactiveness in workgroups: A structural equation model]. Anales de Psicología, 22(2), 234-242.
  • Topa, G., Moriano, J.A., & Morales, J.F. (2008). Identidad social y apoyo percibido en las organizaciones: sus efectos sobre las conductas de ciudadanía [Social identity and perceived support in organizations: Their effects on citizenship behaviors]. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 1-8.
  • Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Wernsing, T.S., & Peterson, S.J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., Avey, J.B., & Oke, A. (2011). Authentically leading groups: The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 4. http://search. proquest.com/docview/839723530?accountid=14609.
  • Yammarino, F.J., & Dansereau, F. (2011). Multi-level issues in evolutionary theory, organization science, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1042-1057.
  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G. Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet