Authentic leadership and its influence on group cohesion and organizational identification:the role of organizational justice as a mediating variable

Références bibliographiques

• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 270–301. doi:10.1177/1094428112470848.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
• Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–221. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
• Callow, N., Smith, M. J., Hardy, L., Arthur, C. A., & Hardy, J. (2009). Measurement of transformational leadership and its relationship with team cohesion and performance level. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 395–412. doi:10.1080/10413200903204754
• Carron, A. (1982). Cohessiveness in sport groups. Interpretation and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.
• Carron, A., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266.
• Cepeda, G., & Roldán, J. (2008). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas. Universidad de Sevilla. Retrieved 2 October 2012, from ciberconta.unizar.es/doctorado/PLSGabrielCepeda.pdf
• Ceri-Booms, M. (2010). An empirical study on transactional and authentic leaders: Exploring the mediating role of trust in leader on organizational identification. The Business Review, Cambridge, 14, 235–243.
• Ceri-Booms, M. (2012). How can authentic leaders create organizational identification? An empirical study on Turkish employees. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7, 172–190.
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
• Chin, W. W., & Frye, T. (2003). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwah (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrwnce Erlbaum.
• Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (1996, December). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and Voice Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on information systems, Cleveland, OH.
• Cho, J., & Dansereau, F. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 409–421. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.006
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
• Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 165–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• De Cremer, D. (2004). Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated organizational identification. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 4–13. doi:10.1108/02683940510571603
• Dion, K. L. (2000). Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 7–26. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7
• Edú, S., Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., & Topa, G. (2012). Authentic leadership and its effect on employees’ organizacional citizenship behaviors. Psicothema, 24, 561–566.
• Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x
• Elosua, P. (2003). Sobre la validez de los tests. Psicothema, 15, 315–321.
• Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: The University of Akron Press.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
• Gamero, N., Peiró, J. M., Zornoza, A., & Picazo, C. (2009). Roles of participation and feedback in group potency. Psychological Reports, 105, 293–313. doi:10.2466/PR0.105.1.293-313
• Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1120–1145. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair versus being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111–157.
• Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). El liderazgo como gestión de la identidad social. In F. Molero & J. F. Morales (Eds.), Liderazgo: Hecho y ficción (pp. 77–116). Madrid: Alianza.
• Henseler, J., & Chin, W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using Partial Least Squares Path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 82–109. doi:10.1080/10705510903439003
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–31.
• Houchin, G. (2011). Authentic leadership in sports teams (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 40). Chattanooga, The University of Tennessee. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/870031125?accountid=14609. (870031125).
• House, W. C. (1966). Effects of group cohesiveness on organizations performance. Personnel Journal., 45, 28–33.
• Iturbide, L., Elosua, P., & Yanes, F. (2010). Medida de la cohesión en equipos deportivos. Adaptación al español del Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ). Psicothema, 22, 482–488.
• Kiersch, C. E. (2012). A multi-level examination of authentic leadership and organizational justice in uncertain times. (Doctoral Dissertation), Colorado State University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3523691).
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
• Moliner, C., Martínez-Tur, V., & Carbonell, S. (2003). ¿Cuántas dimensiones tiene la justicia organizacional?. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 13, 91–106.
• Moriano, J. A., Molero, F., & Lévy Mangin, J. P. (2011). Liderazgo auténtico. Concepto y validación del cuestionario ALQ en España. Psicothema, 23, 336–341.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Reicher, S., Haslam, S., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547–568. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007
• Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257–266. doi:10.1002/job.141
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). Lexander SmartPLS 2.0 (beta). SmartPLS. Hamburg, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de
• Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Papeles Del Psicólogo, 31, 34–45.
• Sánchez, J., & Yurrebaso, A. (2009). Group cohesion: Relationships with work team culture. Psicothema, 21, 97–104.
• Sinclair, A. L. (2003). Disentangling contributions of process elements to the fair process effect: A policy-capturing approach (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Retrieved 9 October 2012, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305300456?accountid=14609. (305300456).
• Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2003). Interpersonal treatment, social identity, and organizational behavior. In S. Haslam, D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 155–171). New York: Psychology Press.
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
• Topa, G., & Morales, J. F. (2006). Identificación organizacional y proactividad personal en grupos de trabajo: Un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Anales De Psicología, 22, 234–242.
• Topa, G., Moriano, J. A., & Morales, J. F. (2008). Identidad social y apoyo percibido en las organizaciones: Sus efectos sobre las conductas de ciudadanía. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42, 1–8.
• Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. S. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizacional settings (pp. 77–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126. doi:10.1177/0149206307308913
• Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice, climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 517–529. doi:10.1037/a0018867
• Wendt, H., Euwema, M. C., & Van Emmerik, I. (2009). Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 358–370. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.005
• Wold, H. (1985). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Vol. 2, pp. 1–54). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Wold, S., Esbensen, K., & Geladi, P. (1987). Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2, 37–52. doi:10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9