Exploiting Geolocation, User and Temporal Information for Natural Hazards Monitoring in Twitter

  1. Víctor Fresno
  2. Arkaitz Zubiaga
  3. Heng Ji
  4. Raquel Martínez
Journal:
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

ISSN: 1135-5948

Year of publication: 2015

Issue: 54

Pages: 85-92

Type: Article

More publications in: Procesamiento del lenguaje natural

Abstract

During emergency situation events it is important to acquire as much information about the event as possible, and social media sites like Twitter offer important real-time user contributed data. Typical Information Filtering techniques are keyword-based approaches or focused on co-occurrence with keywords. However, these approaches can miss relevant local information if messages do not contain an initially considered event-related keyword. Considering geolocation, user and temporal information within a pseudo-relevance feedback approach we can find event-related terminology but not co-occurring with initially considered keywords. Thus, taking into account the temporal aspect we can modify a query expansion function like Kullback-Leibler divergence in order to improve the Information Filtering process. Our proposed approaches have been evaluated in two Twitter datasets associated with real-world events, obtaining encouraging results.

Funding information

Funders

  • U.S. Army Research Laboratory
    • W911NF-09-2-0053
  • Norfolk Southern

Bibliographic References

  • Carpineto, C., R. de Mori, G. Romano, and B. Bigi. 2001. An information-theoretic approach to automatic query expansion. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 19(1):1-27.
  • De Longueville, B., R.S. Smith, and G. Luraschi. 2009. OMG, from here, i can see the ames!: A use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatiotemporal data on forest fires. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks, LBSN '09, pages 73{80, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  • Deerwester, S., S.T. Dumais, G.W. Furnas, T.K. Landauer, and R. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, 41(6):391-407.
  • Hiemstra, D. 2009. Information Retrieval Models. Information Retrieval: Searching in the 21st Century, Wiley.
  • Hughes, A.L. and L. Palen. 2009. Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(3):248-260.
  • Imran, M., C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and S. Vieweg. 2014. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. CoRR, abs/1407.7071.
  • Kullback, S. and R.A. Leibler. 1951. On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist., 22(1):79-86.
  • Mills, A., R. Chen, J. Lee, and H. R. Rao. 2009. Web 2.0 emergency applications: How useful can twitter be for emergency response. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 5:3-26.
  • Palen, L., K. Anderson, G. Mark, J. Martin, D. Sicker, and D. Grunwald. 2010. A vision for technology-mediated public participation and assistance in mass emergencies and disasters. In The University of Edinburgh, editor, International Academic Research Conference, 14-16 April.
  • Sakaki, T., M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 851-860. ACM.
  • Sasaki, K., S. Nagano, K. Ueno, and K. Cho. 2012. Feasibility study on detection of transportation information exploiting twitter as a sensor. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Workshop on When the City Meets the Citizen, AAAI Technical Report WS-12-04.
  • Schnebele, E. and G. Cervone. 2013. Improving remote sensing ood assessment using volunteered geographical data. Na- tural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13(3):669-677.
  • Shinohara, M., A. Hattori, S. Ioroi, H. Tanaka, H. Hayami, H. Fujioka, and Y. Harada. 2011. Design and trial of a cellphone-based hazard information sharing system for residents living close to an incident. In Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies (NGMAST), 2011 5th International Conference on, pages 13-18, Sept.
  • Shklovski, I., L. Palen, and J. Sutton. 2008. Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster events. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2008, pages 127-136.
  • Sinnappan, S., C. Farrell, and E. Stewart. 2010. Priceless tweets! a study on twitter messages posted during crisis: Black saturday. In Proceedings of Information Systems: De ning and Establishing a High Impact Discipline, number 39, Brisbane, Australia, 01-03 December 2010. 21st International Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2010).
  • Sorensen, J.H. and B. Sorensen. 2007. Community processes: Warning and evacuation. In Handbook of Disaster Research, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer New York, pages 183-199.
  • Starbird, K., L. Palen, A.L. Hughes, and S. Vieweg. 2010. Chatter on the red: What hazards threat reveals about the social life of microblogged information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '10, pages 241-250, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  • Steyvers, M. and T. Griffiths, 2007. Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning, chapter Probabilistic topic models. Erlbaum, L.
  • Sutton, J., L. Palen, and I. Shklovki. 2008. Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent use of social media in the 2007 southern california fires. In Proceedings of the 2008 Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management Conference (ISCRAM 2008), pages 624-631, Washington, D.C.
  • Vieweg, S., A.L. Hughes, K. Starbird, and L. Palen. 2010. Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1079-1088. ACM.
  • Xu, J. and W.B. Croft. 1996. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of SIGIR 96, pa- ges 4-11, Zurich. ACM.
  • Zubiaga, A., D. Spina, V. Fresno, and R. Martínez. 2011. Classifying trending topics: a typology of conversation triggers on twitter. In C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, and I. Ruthven, editors, CIKM, pages 2461-2464. ACM.