Transformational leadership and group potency in small military unitsThe mediating role of group identification and cohesion

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahronson, A., Cameron, J.E., The nature and consequences of group cohesion in a military sample. Military Psychology 19 (2007), 9–25, 10.1080/08995600701323277.
• Alcover, C.M., Gil, F., Potencia en grupos: un constructo entre la autoeficacia y la motivación colectiva [Group potency: a construct halfway between self-efficacy and collective motivation]. Apuntes de Psicología 18 (2000), 123–143.
• Arthur, C.A., Hardy, L., Transformational leadership: A quasi-experimental study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 35 (2014), 38–53, 10.1108/LODJ-03-2012-0033.
• Ashforth, B.E., Mael, F., Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review 14 (1989), 20–39.
• Avolio, B.J., Bass, B.M., Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. 3rd ed, 2004, Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA.
• Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986), 1173–1182, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
• Bartone, P.T., Johnsen, B.H., Eid, J., Brun, W., Laberg, J.C., Factors influencing small-unit cohesion in Norwegian Navy officer cadets. Military Psychology 14 (2002), 1–22, 10.1207/S15327876MP1401_01.
• Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., Revised manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. 1997, Mind Garden, Palo Alto, CA.
• Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I., Berson, Y., Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 207–218, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207.
• Bass, B.M., Bass, R., The Bass handbook of leadership: theory, research and managerial applications. 4th ed., 2008, Free Press, New York.
• Beal, D.J., Cohen, R.R., Burke, M.J., McLendon, C.L., Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 989–1004, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989.
• Becker, T.E., Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods 8 (2005), 274–289.
• Campion, M.A., Papper, E.M., Medsker, G.J., Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology 49 (1996), 429–452.
• Carron, A.V., Brawley, R.L., Widmeyer, W.N., The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. Duda, J.L., (eds.) Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement, 1998, Fitness Information Technology, Morgantown, WV, 213–226.
• Carron, A., Widmeyer, W.N., Brawley, L.R., The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology 7 (1985), 244–266.
• Cepeda, G. & Roldán, J. (2008). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas [Applying the PLS technique in practice in business administration]. Universidad de Sevilla. Retrieved from ciberconta.unizar.es/doctorado/PLSGabrielCepeda.pdf.
• Duffy, M.K., Shaw, J.D., The Salieri syndrome: Consequences of envy in groups. Small Group Research 31 (2000), 3–23.
• Easley, R.F., Devaraj, S., Crant, J.M., Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (2003), 247–268, 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045747.
• Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B., A primer for soft modeling. 1992, The University of Akron Press, Akron, OH.
• Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981), 39–50, 10.2307/3151312.
• García, J.M., Gutierrez, M.T., & Núñez, M.A. (2005). ¿Es posible medir la moral? Un modelo operativo que intenta explicar esa compleja realidad [Can morale be measured? An operational model that attempts to explain this complex reality]. Instituto Universitario “General Gutiérrez Mellado”. Madrid.
• Gibson, C. B. (1996, August). Collective cognition in action: The formation, operation, and transformation of group-efficacy beliefs in the workplace. In J. George-Falvy (Chair), Defining, measuring, and influencing group level efficacy beliefs. Symposium conducted at the 56th annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Cincinnati, Ohio.
• Griffith, J., Measurement of Group Cohesion in U.S. Army Units. Basic & Applied Social Psychology 9 (1988), 149–171, 10.1207/s15324834basp0902_6.
• Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K.A., Joshi, A., Beauien, J.M., A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002), 819–832.
• Gully, S.M., Joshi, A., Incalcaterra, K.A., Beaubien, J.M., A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002), 819–832, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819.
• Guzzo, R.A., Yost, P.R., Campbell, R.J., Shea, G.P., Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal o f Social Psychology 32 (1993), 87–106, 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00987.x.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Multivariate data analysis. 2006, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
• Hannah, S.T., Uhl-Bien, M., Avolio, B.J., Cavarretta, F.L., A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. Leadership Quarterly 20 (2009), 897–919, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.006.
• Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., Platow, M.J., El liderazgo como gestión de la identidad social [Leadership as a way to manage social identity]. Molero, F., Morales, J.F., (eds.) Liderazgo: Hecho y ficción, 2011, Alianza, Madrid, 77–116.
• Henseler, J., Chin, W., A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using Partial Least Squares Path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 17 (2010), 82–109, 10.1080/10705510903439003.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20 (2009), 277–320, 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.
• Hogg, M.A., Abrams, D., Otten, S., Hinkle, S., The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research 35 (2004), 246–276, 10.1177/1046496404263424.
• Hogg, M.A., Van Knippenberg, D., Rast, D.E. III, The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology 23 (2012), 258–304, 10.1080/10463283.2012.741134.
• Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D., TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology 56 (2005), 517–543, 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
• Iturbide, L., Elosua, P., Yanes, F., Medida de la cohesión en equipos deportivos. Adaptación al español del Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) [Measuring cohesion in sports teams. Adaptation of the Group Environment Questionnaire, GEQ, to Spanish]. Psicothema 22 (2010), 482–488.
• James, L.B., Demaree, R.G., Wolf, G., Estimating within-group inter-rater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1984), 85–98.
• Jordan, M.H., Field, H.S., Armenakis, A.A., Group Research 33 (2002), 121–150, 10.1177/104649640203300104.
• Jung, D.I., Sosik, J.J., Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research 33 (2002), 313–336, 10.1177/10496402033003002.
• Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Jaworski, R.A., Bennett, N., Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management 30 (2004), 285–304, 10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002.
• Molero, F., Recio, A.P., Cuadrado, M.I., Transformational leadership and transactional leadership: an analysis of the factor structure of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) in a Spanish sample. Psicothema 22 (2010), 495–501.
• Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., Hambleton, R.K., Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: segunda edición [Guidelines for the translation and adaptation of tests: second edition]. Psicothema 25 (2013), 151–157.
• Oliver, L.W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S.H., Pandhi, N.A., A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. Military Psychology 11 (1999), 57–83, 10.1207/s15327876mp1101_4.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.M., Lee, J., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003), 879–903, 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
• Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 (2008), 879–891, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
• Reicher, S., Haslam, S., Hopkins, N., Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly 16 (2005), 547–568, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007.
• Rico, R., Alcover de, l.H., Tabernero, C., Efectividad de los equipos de trabajo, una revisión de la última década de investigación (1999-2009). Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo y De Las Organizaciones 26 (2010), 47–71, 10.5093/tr2010v26n1a4.
• Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0. Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de.
• Salo, M., Sinko, R., The science of unit cohesion – its characteristics and impacts. 2012, National Defence University. Department of behavioural Sciences, Jävernää, Finland.
• Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Brainin, E., Popper, M., Leadership and social identification in military units: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30 (2000), 612–640, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02499.x.
• Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., Popper, M., Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1998), 387–409, 10.2307/257080.
• Shea, G.P., Guzzo, R.A., Group effectiveness: What really matters?. Sloan Management Review 28 (1987), 1986–1998.
• Siebold, G.L., The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society 33 (2007), 286–295, 10.1177/0095327X06294173.
• Siebold, G.L., The science of military cohesion. Salo, M., Sinkko, R., (eds.) The science of unit cohesion – its characteristics and impacts, 2012, National Defense University. Department of Behavioural Sciences, Jävernää, Finland., 45–64.
• Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W.D., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D., A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management 27 (2002), 66–96, 10.1177/1059601102027001005.
• Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S.S., Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (1997), 89–103, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.89.
• Stajkovic, A.D., Lee, D., Nyberg, A.J., Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2009), 814–828, 10.1037/a0015659.
• Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C., The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Worchel, S., Austin, W.G., (eds.) Psychology of intergroup relations, 1985, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, 7–24.
• Tziner, A., Chernyak-Hai, L., Perspectives on groups and work teams in the workplace. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones 28 (2012), 51–66, 10.5093/tr2012a5.
• Tziner, A., Vardi, Y., Effects of command style and group cohesiveness on the performance effectiveness of self-selected tank crews. Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (1982), 769–775, 10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.769.
• Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H., Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. 2010, Springer, Heidelberg.
• Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Zhu, W., How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: the role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology 61 (2008), 793–825, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00131.x.
• Wheelan, S.A., Group processes: A developmental perspective. 2005, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
• Wong, K., Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin Technical Note, 24, 2013, 1.
• Yammarino, F.J., Dansereau, F., Multi-level issues in evolutionary theory, organization science, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 22 (2011), 1042–1057, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.002.
• Zaccaro, S.J., Klimoski, R., The interface of leadership and team processes. Group & Organization Management 27 (2002), 4–13, 10.1177/1059601102027001002.
• Zaccaro, S.J., Rittman, A.L., Marks, M.A., Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 12 (2001), 451–483, 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5.