Three-dimensional analysis of the titanosaurian limb skeletonimplications for systematic analysis

  1. Adrián Páramo 1
  2. Pedro Mocho 2
  3. Francisco Ortega 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidade de Lisboa
    info

    Universidade de Lisboa

    Lisboa, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/01c27hj86

Revista:
Journal of iberian geology: an international publication of earth sciences

ISSN: 1886-7995 1698-6180

Año de publicación: 2020

Título del ejemplar: Dinosaurs and other Biota: from Bones to Environments

Volumen: 46

Número: 4

Páginas: 369-402

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1007/S41513-020-00139-8 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal of iberian geology: an international publication of earth sciences

Resumen

El esqueleto apendicular de los titanosaurios presenta similitudes morfológicas entre clados muy diversos y su información osteológica es de menor utilidad para taxonomía respecto a otras regiones del esqueleto. Es possible que se produzca una convergencia morfológica debido a similitudes morfofuncionales entre miembros de los diferentes grupos de titanosaurios. Además, la elevada variabilidad intraespecífica ha dificultado la diferenciación entre formas de titanosaurio morfológicamente similares en el Cretácico tardío del dominio Ibero-Armoricano. El uso de técnicas de morfometría geométrica 3D así como análisis discriminante en una muestra abundante de ejemplares apendiculares del yacimiento de Lo Hueco y otros taxones de titanosaurio ha permitido caracterizar algunas diferencias entre los distintos clados de titanosaurios con el control de la variabilidad intraespecífica. Estos métodos se aplicaron también en análisis de superficies permitiendo reconocer similitudes morfológicas congruentes con convergencias morfofuncionales entre uno de los morfotipos de lithostrotios identificados en Lo Hueco (Morfortipo II) y formas gráciles de colossosaurios como Mendozasaurus neguyelap. Sin embargo, el Morfotipo I de Lo Hueco presentaría una morfología titanosauriana más típica, asemejándose a Jainosaurus cf. septentrionalis. El uso de análisis discriminantes permitió distinguir Colossosauria en base a la morfología de sus extremidades por primera vez. También se puede observar que la morfología de Colossosauria y Saltasauridae divergen de morfologías apendicular no autopodiales más típicamente titanosaurianas. Nuestros resultados sugieren que las grandes diferencias morfológicas de las extremidades de Saltasauridae con otros clados se debería a su especialización en comparación a otros titanosaurios muestrados en este estudio. El uso de semilandmarks de superficie y análisis discriminante permitió proponer una serie de potenciales caracteres osteológicos nuevos, útiles para el análisis filogenético, gracias a maximizar las diferencias existentes entre los diferentes clados muestreados.

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L., & Kaliontzopoulou, A. (2019). Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.0. https: //cran.r-projec t.org/packag e=geomor ph.
  • Adler, D., Murdoch, D., et al. (2019). rgl: 3D visualization using OpenGL. https ://cran.r-proje ct.org/packa ge=rgl.
  • Apesteguía, S. (2005). Evolution of the titanosaur metacarpus. In V. Tidwell & K. Carpenter (Eds.), Thunder-lizards: The sauropodomorph dinosaurs (pp. 321–345). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Arbour, J. H., & Brown, C. M. (2014). Incomplete specimens in geometric morphometric analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(1), 16–26.
  • Bates, K. T., Mannion, P. D., Falkingham, P. L., Brusatte, S. L., Hutchinson, J. R., Otero, A., et al. (2016). Temporal and phylogenetic evolution of the sauropod dinosaur body plan. Royal Society Open Science. https ://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.15063 6.
  • Blender Online Community (2018). Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package. Blender Institute, Amsterdam. URL http:// www.blend er.org
  • Bonaparte, J. F., Heinrich, W.-D., & Wild, R. (2000). Review of Janenschia WILD, with the description of a new sauropod from the Tendaguru beds of Tanzania and a discussion on the systematic value of procoelous caudal vertebrae in the sauropoda. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 256(1–3), 25–76.
  • Bonnan, M. F. (2004). Morphometric analysis of humerus and femur shape in Morrison sauropods: Implications for functional morphology and paleobiology. Paleobiology, 30(3), 444–470.
  • Bonnan, M. F. (2007). Linear and geometric morphometric analysis of long bone scaling patterns in Jurassic neosauropod dinosaurs: Their functional and paleobiological implications. Anatomical Record, 290(9), 1089–1111.
  • Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Borsuk-Bialynicka, M. (1977). A New Camarasaurid Sauropod Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii gen. n., sp. n. from the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia. Paleontologia Polonica, 37, 5–64.
  • Botton-Divet, L., Houssaye, A., Herrel, A., Fabre, A.-C., & Cornette, R. (2015). Tools for quantitative form description; an evaluation of different software packages for semi-landmark analysis. PeerJ, 3, e1417.
  • Brown, C. M., Arbour, J. H., & Jackson, D. A. (2012). Testing of the effect of missing data estimation and distribution in morphometric multivariate data analyses. Systematic Biology, 61(6), 941–954.
  • Canudo, J. I. (2001). Descripción de un fragmento proximal de fémur de Titanosauridae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) del Maastrichtiense superior de Serraduy (Huesca). In G. Meléndez, Z. Herrera, G. Delvene, & B. Azanza (Eds.), XVII Jornadas de Paleontología. Los fósiles y la Paleogeografía (pp. 255–262). Zaragoza: Sociedad Española de Paleontología y Áreay Museo de Paleontología de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  • Carballido, J. L., Marpmann, J. S., Schwarz, D., & Pabst, B. (2012). New information on a juvenile sauropod specimen from the Morrison Formation and the reassessment of its systematic position. Palaeontology. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01139 .x.
  • Carballido, J. L., Pol, D., Cerda, I. A., & Salgado, J. L. (2011). The Osteology of Chubutisaurus insignis Del Corro, 1975 (Dinosauria: Neosauropoda) from the “Middle” Cretaceous of Central Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 31(1), 93–110.
  • Carballido, J. L., Pol, D., Otero, A., Cerda, I. A., Salgado, J. L., Garrido, A. C., et al. (2017). A new giant titanosaur sheds light on body mass evolution among sauropod dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. https ://doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2017.1219.
  • Carballido, J. L., & Sander, P. M. (2014). Postcranial axial skeleton of Europasaurus holgeri (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Germany: Implications for sauropod ontogeny and phylogenetic relationships of basal Macronaria. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 12(3), 335–387.
  • Carrano, M. T. (1998). Locomotion in non-avian dinosaurs: Integrating data from hindlimb kinematics, in vivo strains, and bone morphology. Paleobiology, 24(4), 450–469.
  • Carrano, M. T. (2005). The evolution of sauropod locomotion. In K. A. CurryRogers & J. A. Wilson (Eds.), The Sauropods: Evolution and paleobiology (pp. 229–250). California: University of California Press.
  • Carrano, M. T. (2006). Body-size evolution in the Dinosauria. In M. T. Carrano, T. J. Gaudin, R. W. Blob, & J. Wible (Eds.), Amniote paleobiology: Perspectives on the evolution of mammals, birds, and reptiles (pp. 225–268). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Christian, A., & Dzemski, G. (2011). Neck posture in Sauropods. In Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: Understanding the life of giants (pp. 251–262).
  • Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., & Scopigno, R. (1998). Metro: Measuring error on simplified surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum, 17(2), 167–174.
  • Claude, J. (2008). Morphometrics with R. Use R!. New York: Springer.
  • Company, J., Suberbiola, X. P., & Ruiz-Omeñaca, J. I. (2009). Nuevos restos fósiles del dinosaurio Lirainosaurus. Ameghiniana, 46(2), 391–405.
  • Curry Rogers, K. (2005). Titanosauria: A phylogenetic overview. In K. Curry Rogers & J. A. Wilson (Eds.), The Sauropods: Evolution and paleobiology (pp. 50–103). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Curry Rogers, K. (2009). The postcranial osteology of Rapetosaurus krausei (Sauropoda: Titanosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 29(4), 1046–1086.
  • D’Emic, M. D. (2012). The early evolution of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 166, 624–671.
  • D’Emic, M. D., Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Benson, R. B. J., Pang, Q., & Zhengwu, C. (2013). Osteology of Huabeisaurus allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China. PLoS One. https ://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pone.00693 75.
  • Darlington, R. B., Weinberg, S. L., & Walberg, H. J. (1973). Canonical variate analysis and related techniques. Review of Educational Research, 43, 433–454.
  • Díez Díaz, V., Garcia, G., Pereda Suberbiola, X., Jentgen-Ceschino, B., Stein, K. H. W., Godefroit, P., & Valentin, X. (2018). A new titanosaurian sauropod from the Late Cretaceous of Velaux-La Bastide Neuve (southern France). In XVI annual meeting of the European association of vertebrate paleontologists (p. 60). Caparica, Lisbon.
  • Díez Díaz, V., Garcia, G., Pereda-Suberbiola, X., Jentgen-Ceschino, B., Stein, K., Godefroit, P., et al. (2018). The titanosaurian dinosaur Atsinganosaurus velauciensis (Sauropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of southern France: New material, phylogenetic affinities, and palaeobiogeographical implications. Cretaceous Research, 91, 429–456.
  • Díez Díaz, V., Mocho, P., Páramo, A., Escaso, F., Marcos-Fernández, F., Sanz, J. L., et al. (2016). A new titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Lo Hueco (Cuenca, Spain). Cretaceous Research, 68, 49–60.
  • Díez Díaz, V., Pereda Suberbiola, X., & Company, J. (2015). Updating titanosaurian diversity (Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Spain: The fossil site of Laño and Chera. Spanish Journal of Palaeontology, 30(2), 293–306.
  • Díez Díaz, V., Suberbiola, X. P., & Sanz, J. L. (2013). Appendicular skeleton and dermal armour of the Late Cretaceous titanosaur Lirainosaurus astibiae (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from Spain. Palaeontologia Electronica, 16(2), 18p.
  • Falkingham, P. L. (2012). Acquisition of high resolution threedimensional models using free, open-source, photogrammetric software. Paleontologia Electronica, 15(1), 1–15.
  • Falkingham, P. L. (2013). Low cost 3D scanning using off-the-shelf video gaming peripherals. Journal of Paleontological Techniques, 11, 1–9.
  • Garcia, G., Amico, S., Fournier, F., Thouand, E., & Valentin, X. (2010). A new Titanosaur genus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of southern France and its paleobiogeographic implications. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 181(3), 269–277.
  • González Riga, B. J. (2003). A new Titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Mendoza Province, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 40(2), 155–172.
  • González Riga, B. J., Lamanna, M. C., Ortiz David, L. D., Calvo, J. O., & Coria, J. P. (2016). A gigantic new dinosaur from Argentina and the evolution of the sauropod hind foot. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1–15.
  • González Riga, B. J., Lamanna, M. C., Otero, A., Ortiz David, L. D., Kellner, A. W. A., & Ibiricu, L. M. (2019). An overview of the appendicular skeletal anatomy of South American titanosaurian sauropods, with definition of a newly recognized clade. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. https ://doi. org/10.1590/0001-37652 01920 18037 4.
  • González Riga, B. J., Mannion, P. D., Poropat, S. F., Ortiz David, L. D., & Coria, J. P. (2018). Osteology of the Late Cretaceous Argentinean sauropod dinosaur Mendozasaurus neguyelap: Implications for basal titanosaur relationships. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 20, 1–46.
  • Gorscak, E., & O‘Connor, P. M. (2016). Time-calibrated models support congruency between Cretaceous continental rifting and titanosaurian evolutionary history. Biology Letters, 12(4), 20151047.
  • Gorscak, E., O’Connor, P. M., Roberts, E. M., & Stevens, N. J. (2017). The second titanosaurian (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the middle Cretaceous Galula Formation, southwestern Tanzania, with remarks on African titanosaurian diversity. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 37(4), e1343250.
  • Gunz, P. (2005). Statistical and geometric morphometric reconstruction of hominid crania. Reconstructing autralopithecine ontogeny. Vienna: University of Vienna.
  • Gunz, P., & Mitteroecker, P. (2013). Semilandmarks: A method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix The Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24(1), 103–109.
  • Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2005). Semilandmarks in three dimensions. In D. E. Slice (Ed.) Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology (pp. 73–98).
  • Gunz, P., Mitteroecker, P., Neubauer, S., Weber, G. W., & Bookstein, F. L. (2009). Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. Journal of Human Evolution, 57(1), 48–62.
  • Harris, J. D. (2006). The significance of Suuwassea emilieae (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) for flagellicaudatan intrarelationships and evolution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 4(2), 185–198.
  • Henderson, D. M. (2006). Burly gaits: Centers of mass, stability, and the trackways of sauropod dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26(4), 907–921.
  • Jakob, W., Tarini, M., Panozzo, D., & Sorkine-Hornung, O. (2015). Instant field-aligned meshes. In ACM transactions on graphics (proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia 2015) (pp. 1–15).
  • Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16(2), 81–121.
  • Langer, M. C., Franca, M., & Gabriel, S. (2007). The pectoral girdle and forelimb anatomy of the stem-sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim (Upper Triassic, Brazil). Special Papers in Palaeontology, 77, 113–137.
  • Lautenschlager, S. (2017). From bone to pixel—fossil restoration and reconstruction with digital techniques. Geology Today, 33(4), 155–159.
  • Lautenschlager, S., Rayfield, E. J., Altangerel, P., Zanno, L. E., & Witmer, L. M. (2012). The endocranial anatomy of therizinosauria and its implications for sensory and cognitive function. PLoS One, 7(12), e52289.
  • Le Loeuff, J. (1995). Ampelosaurus atacis (nov, gen., nov. sp.), un nouveau Titanosauridae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) du Crétacé supérieur de la Haute Vallée de l’Aude (France). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie Des Sciences à Paris Série IIa, 321, 693–699.
  • Le Loeuff, J. (2005). Osteology of Ampelosaurus atacis (Titanosauria) from Southern France. In V. Tidwell & K. Carpenter (Eds.), Thunder-lizards: The sauropodomorph dinosaurs (1st ed., pp. 115–137). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Lydekker, R. (1893). The dinosaurs of patagonia. Anales Del Museo de La Plata, 2, 1–14.
  • Mallison, H., & Wings, O. (2014). Photogrammetry in paleontology—a practical guide. Journal of Paleontological Techniques, 12, 1–13.
  • Mannion, P. D., Allain, R., & Moine, O. (2017). The earliest known titanosauriform sauropod dinosaur and the evolution of Brachiosauridae. PeerJ, 5, e3217.
  • Mannion, P. D., Schwarz, D., Upchurch, P., & Wings, O. (2019). Taxonomic affinities and biogeographic implications of the putative titanosaurs (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) from the Late Jurassic Tendaguru Formation of Tanzania. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, XX, 1–126.
  • Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Barnes, R. N., & Mateus, O. (2013). Osteology of the Late Jurassic Portuguese sauropod dinosaur Lusotitan atalaiensis (Macronaria) and the evolutionary history of basal titanosauriforms. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 168(1), 98–206.
  • Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Mateus, O., Barnes, R. N., & Jones, M. E. H. (2012). New information on the anatomy and systematic position of Dinheirosaurus lourinhanensis (Sauropoda: Diplodocoidea) from the Late Jurassic of Portugal, with a review of European diplodocoids. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 10, 1–31.
  • Mitteroecker, P., & Bookstein, F. L. (2011). Linear discrimination, ordination, and the visualization of selection gradients in modern morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology, 38(1), 100–114.
  • Mocho, P., Escaso, F., Marcos-Fernández, F., Páramo, A., Vidal, D. & Ortega, F. (2019b). Preliminary systematic overview on a new titanosaurian specimen from the Upper Cretaceous of Lo Hueco (Cuenca, Spain). In 17th annual meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontology (p. 76).
  • Mocho, P., Páramo, A., Díez Díaz, V., Escaso, F., Marcos-Fernández, F., Sanz, J.L. & Ortega & F. (2016). Looking through the axial skeleton of the Lo Hueco titanosaurians. In: Torcida Fernández- Baldor, F., Canudo, J.I., Huerta, P., Pereda, X. (Eds.), VII International symposium about dinosaurs palaeontology and their environment (pp. 99–100).
  • Mocho, P., Páramo, A., Escaso, F., Marcos-Fernández, F., Vidal, D. & Ortega, F. (2019c). Titanosaurians from Lo Hueco (Campanian– Maastrichtian) reveal new information about the evolutionary history of European titanosaurians. In 63rd annual meeting of the Paleontological Association (pp. 110–111).
  • Mocho, P., Páramo, A., & Ortega, F. (2019a). Titanosaurians from the Iberian Peninsula: An overview and future perspectives. In VIII international symposium about dinosaurs palaeontology and their environment.
  • Mocho, P., Pérez-García, A., Martín-Jiménez, M., Ortega, F., Martín Jiménez, M., & Ortega, F. (2018). New remains from the Spanish Cenomanian shade light on the Gondwanan origin of European Early Cretaceous titanosaurs. Cretacaceous Research. https ://doi. org/10.1016/j.toxle t.2014.06.131.
  • Molnar, J. L., Pierce, S. E., & Hutchinson, J. R. (2012). Idealized landmark-based geometric reconstructions of poorly preserved fossil material: A case study of an early tetrapod vertebra. Palaeontologia Electronica, 15(1), 1–18.
  • Ortega, F., Bardet, N., Barroso-Barcenilla, F., Callapez, P. M. P. M., Cambra-moo, O., Daviero- Gómez, V., et al. (2015). The biota of the Upper Cretaceous site of “Lo Hueco” (Cuenca, Spain). Journal of Iberian Geology, 41(1), 83–99.
  • Otero, A. (2010). The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 55(3), 399–426.
  • Otero, A. (2018). Forelimb musculature and osteological correlates in Sauropodomorpha (Dinosauria, Saurischia). PLoS One, 13(7), e0198988.
  • Páramo, A., Mocho, P., Marcos-Fernández, F., Ortega, F., & Sanz, J. L. (2017). 3D geometric morphometrics on the hind limb of the Titanosaurs from Lo Hueco: Dwarf taxa or Small Individuals? In 15th annual meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists. Zitteliana, 91, 68.
  • Páramo, A., Mocho, P., Ortega, F., & Sanz, J. L. (2018). Intraspecific variability in and its effects on systematic assessment of the titanosaurs from Lo Hueco (Late Cretaceous. Cuenca, Spain). In XVI annual meeting of European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists (p. 147).
  • Páramo, A., Ortega, F., Mocho, P., & Sanz, J. L. (2016). Femoral variability in two titanosaur taxa from Lo Hueco (Cuenca, Spain): Insights for iberoarmorican titanosaur diversity assessment. In F. Torcida, I. C. Jose, P. Huerta, & X. Pereda-Suberbiola (Eds.), VII international symposium about dinosaurs palaeontology and their environment (pp. 107–108). Salas de los Infantes: Colectivo Arqueológico y Paleontológico de Salas.
  • Páramo, A., Ortega, F., & Sanz, J. L. (2017b). Comparison Between Classification Methods for Isolated Appendicular Titanosaur Bones. In 15th annual meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Paleontologists. Zitteliana, 91 (p. 69).
  • Páramo, A., Ortega, F. & Sanz, J.L. (2019). Morphological disparity and niche exploitation in two Titanosaur forms from the Campanian–Maastrichtian of Lo Hueco (Cuenca, Spain). In XVII annual meeting of the European Association of Vertebrate Palaeontology.
  • Pereda, X., Astibia, H., Murelaga, X., Elorza, J. J., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2000). Taphonomy of the Late Cretaceous dinosaur-bearing beds of the Laño Quarry (Iberian Peninsula). Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 157(3–4), 247–275.
  • Pereda, X., Corral, J. C., Astibia, H., Badiola, A., Bardet, N., Berreteaga, A., et al. (2015). Continental and marine vertebrate assemblages from the Late Cretaceous of the Laño Quarry (Basque- Cantabrian Region, Iberian Peninsula): An update. Journal of Iberian Geology, 41(1), 101–124.
  • Piechowski, R., & Tałanda, M. (2020). The locomotor musculature and posture of the early dinosauriform Silesaurus opolensis provides a new look into the evolution of Dinosauromorpha. Journal of Anatomy. https ://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13155 .
  • Poropat, S. F., Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Hocknull, S. A., Kear, B. P., Kundrát, M., et al. (2016). New Australian sauropods shed light on Cretaceous dinosaur palaeobiogeography. Scientific Reports, 6(April), 1–12.
  • Powell, J. E. (1992). Osteología de Saltasaurus loricatus (Sauropoda– Titanosauridae) del Cretácico Superior del noroeste argentino. In J. L. Sanz & A. D. Buscalioni (Eds.), Los Dinosaurios y Su Entorno Biotico Actas del Segundo Curso de Paleontologia in Cuenca (Vol 4) (pp. 166–229). Cuenca: Instituto “Juan Valdes.”.
  • Powell, J. E. (2003). Revision of South American titanosaurid dinosaurs: Palaeobiological, palaeobiogeographical and phylogenetic aspects. Records of the Queen Victoria Museum, 111, 1–179.
  • Profico, A., Schlager, S., Valoriani, V., Buzi, C., Melchionna, M., Veneziano, A., et al. (2018). Reproducing the internal and external anatomy of fossil bones: Two new automatic digital tools. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 166(4), 979–986.
  • Remes, K. (2007). Evolution of the Pectoral girdle and Forelimb in Sauropodomorpha (Dinosauria, Saurischia): Osteology, myology and fuction. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
  • Rohlf, F. J. (1998). On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 47(1), 147–158.
  • Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification. https ://doi.org/10.1007/ s0035 79900 054.
  • Rohlf, F. J. (2000). On the use of shape spaces to compare morphometric methods. Hystrix. https ://doi.org/10.4404/hystr ix-11.1-4134.
  • Royo-Torres, R. (2009). El saurópodo de Peñarroya de Tastavins (1st ed.). Teruel: Instituto de Estudios Turolenses y Fundación Conjunto Paleontológico de Teruel-Dinópolis.
  • Salgado, J. L., Calvo, J. O., & Coria, R. A. (1995). Relaciones filogenéticas de Pleurocoelus Marsh (Sauropoda). In III Jornadas Argentinas de paleontología de vertebrados (Vol. 18, pp. 156–157).
  • Salgado, J. L., Coria, R. A., & Calvo, J. O. (1997). Evolution of the titanosaurid sauropods I: Phylogenetic analysis based on the postcranial evidence. Ameghiniana, 34(1), 3–32.
  • Salgado, L., Apesteguía, S., & Heredia, S. E. (2005). A new specimen of Neuquensaurus australis, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine titanosaur from North Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 25(3), 623–634.
  • Sallam, H. M., Gorscak, E., O’Connor, P. M., El-Dawoudi, I. A., El- Sayed, S., Saber, S., et al. (2018). New Egyptian sauropod reveals Late Cretaceous dinosaur dispersal between Europe and Africa. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2(3), 445–451.
  • Sanz, J. L., Powell, J. E., Le Loeuff, J., Martínez, R. N., & Pereda Suberbiola, X. (1999). Sauropod remains from the Upper Cretaceous of Laño (north central Spain). Titanosaur phylogenetic relationships. Estudios Del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Alava, 14(1), 235–255.
  • Schlager, S. (2017). Morpho and Rvcg—shape analysis in R. In G. Zheng, S. Li, & G. Szekely (Eds.), Statistical shape and deformation analysis (pp. 217–256). New York: Elsevier.
  • Schlager, S., Profico, A., Di Vincenzo, F., & Manzi, G. (2018). Retrodeformation of fossil specimens based on 3D bilateral semi-landmarks: Implementation in the R package “Morpho”. PLoS One, 13(3), e0194073.
  • Sereno, P. C. (2007). Basal sauropodomorpha: Historical and recent phylogenetic hypotheses, with comments on Ammosaurus major (MARSH, 1889). Special Papers in Palaeontology., 77, 261–289.
  • Souter, T., Cornette, R., Pedraza, J., Hutchinson, J. R., & Baylac, M. (2010). Two applications of 3D semi-landmark morphometrics implying different template designs: The theropod pelvis and the shrew skull. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 9(6–7), 411–422.
  • The R Core Team. (2016). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https ://www.R-proje ct.org/.
  • Tschopp, E., Mateus, O., & Benson, R. B. J. (2015). A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda). PeerJ, 3, e857.
  • Ullmann, P. V., Bonnan, M. F., & Lacovara, K. J. (2017). Characterizing the evolution of wide-gauge features in stylopodial limb elements of titanosauriform sauropods via geometric morphometrics. The Anatomical Record, 300(9), 1618–1635.
  • Ullmann, P. V., & Lacovara, K. J. (2016). Appendicular osteology of Dreadnoughtus schrani, a giant titanosaurian (Sauropoda, Titanosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. https ://doi.org/10.1080/02724 634.2016.12253 03.
  • Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M., & Dodson, P. (2004). Sauropoda. In D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, & H. Osmólska (Eds.), The dinosauria (2nd ed., pp. 259–322). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M., & Galton, P. M. (2007). A phylogenetic analysis of basal sauropodomorph relationships: Implications for the origin of Sauropod dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology, 77, 57–90.
  • Upchurch, P., Mannion, P. D., & Taylor, M. P. (2015). The anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of “Pelorosaurus“ becklesii (Neosauropoda, Macronaria) from the Early Cretaceous of England. PLoS One, 10(6), e0125819.
  • van Buren, C. S., & Bonnan, M. F. (2013). Forearm posture and mobility in quadrupedal dinosaurs. PLoS One, 8(9), e74842.
  • Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). Berlin: Springer.
  • Vidal, D., & Díez Díaz, V. (2017). Reconstructing hypothetical sauropod tails by means of 3D digitization: Lirainosaurus astibiae as case study. Journal of Iberian Geology, 43(2), 293–305.
  • Vila, B., Galobart, À., Canudo, J. I., Le Loeuff, J., Dinarès-Turell, J., Riera, V., et al. (2012). The diversity of sauropod dinosaurs and their first taxonomic succession from the latest Cretaceous of southwestern Europe: Clues to demise and extinction. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 350–352, 19–38.
  • Voegele, K. K., Ullmann, P. V., Lamanna, M. C., & Lacovara, K. J. (2020). Appendicular myological reconstruction of the forelimb of the giant titanosaurian sauropod dinosaur Dreadnoughtus schrani. Journal of Anatomy. https ://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13176 .
  • Whitlock, J. A. (2011). A phylogenetic analysis of Diplodocoidea (Saurischia: Sauropoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. https ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00665 .x.
  • Wiley, D. F., Amenta, N., Alcantara, D. A., Ghosh, D., Kil, Y. J., Delson, E., & Hamann, B. (2005). Evolutionary morphing. In Proceedings of IEEE visualization 2005 (pp. 1–8). Minneapolis.
  • Wilson, J. A. (2002). Sauropod dinosaur phylogeny: Critique and cladistic analysis. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 136, 215–275.
  • Wilson, J. A., & Carrano, M. T. (1999). Titanosaurs and the Origin of “wide-gauge” trackways: A biomechanical and systematic perspective on sauropod locomotion. Paleobiology, 25(2), 252–267.
  • Wilson, J. A., & Sereno, P. C. (1998). Early evolution and high-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 18(2), 1–68.
  • Wilson, J. A., & Upchurch, P. (2003). A revision of Titanosaurus Lydekker (Dinosauria—Sauropoda), the first dinosaur genus with a “Gondwanan” distribution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 1(3), 125–160.
  • Young, C. C., & Chao, S. C. (1972). Mamenchisaurus hochuaensis sp. nov. Memoirs of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Academia Sinica, 8, 1–30.
  • Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., & Sheets, H. D. (2012). Geometric morphometrics for biologists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.