Proyecto HelioxEntornos de interacción para la diversidad funcional

  1. Toboso, Mario 1
  2. Feltrero, Roberto 2
  3. Maltrás, Bruno 3
  1. 1 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
    info

    Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02gfc7t72

  2. 2 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  3. 3 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

ISSN: 2695-9623

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 4

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.37467/GKA-REVHUMAN.V4.747 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Human Review: International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

Resumen

Design and construction of environments influences the functioning chances of people, in an enabling or disabling way. Traditional efforts to remove physical and architectural barriers have evolved into a more comprehensive and 'universalist' vision of accessibility requirements. In the case of new technologies, lack of accessibility produces inequalities and divides in two key aspects: access and use. Combining these two inequalities leads to inequality opportunities for individuals and social groups affected by the digital divide. In order to facilitate access and use to computer for people with nonstandard functioning, we present the technological solution 'Heliox', based on the principles of design for all, open functionality and representational multimodality of technological resources in ICT environment

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aslaksen, F., Bergh, S., Bringa, O. & Heggem, E. (1997). Universal Design. Planning and Design for All. The Norwegian State Council on Disability. http://home.online.no/~bringa/universal.htm
  • BOE (2003). Ley 51/2003, de 2 de diciembre, de Igualdad de Oportunidades, No Discriminación y Accesibilidad Universal de las personas con discapacidad. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2003/12/03/pdfs/A43187-43195.pdf
  • CUD (Centre for Universal Design) (1997). Principlies of Universal Design. North Carolina State University. http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
  • EIDD (European Institute for Design and Disability) (2004). Stockholm Declaration. http://www.designforalleurope.org/Design-for-All/EIDD-Documents/Stockholm-Declaration/
  • European Commission (2001). Discrimination by Design (Background Paper). Conference, Brussels, 3rd December. http://www.accessibletourism.org/resources/dfa_ia_en.pdf
  • G3ict (2007). The Accessibility Imperative. Implications of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for Information and Communication Technologies. http://g3ict.org/resource_center/g3ict_book_-_the_accessibility_imperative
  • Googin, G. & Ch. Newell. (2003). Digital Disability . United Kingdom: Rowan & Littlefield.
  • Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16 (4), pp. 266-275
  • Mueller, J. L. (1998). Assistive technology and universal design in the workplace. Assistive Technology, 10(1), pp. 37-43.
  • ONU (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm
  • Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C. & Thomas, C. (2004). Disabling barriers–Enabling Enviroments. London: Sage.
  • Toboso, M. & Guzmán, F. (2010). Cuerpos, capacidades, exigencias funcionales... y otros lechos de Procusto. Política y Sociedad, 47 (1), pp. 67–83. http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO1010130067A
  • UNESCO (1999). Declaración sobre la Ciencia y el Uso del Saber Científico , Budapest, 1 de julio. http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/esp/declaracion_s.htm
  • UNESCO (2001). COMEST Sub-Commission on “The Ethics of the Information Society”. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001248/124896e.pdf
  • Vacas, F. (2007). TVIC: Tecnologías para la vida cotidiana. Telos, 73. http://www.campusred.net/TELOS/editorial.asp?rev=73
  • Vanderheiden, G. C. (1998). Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: alternatives or complements? Assistive Technology, 10 (1), pp. 29-36.
  • Winner, L. (2007). Is there a right to shape technology? Argumentos de Razón Técnica, 10, pp. 305-328. [1] A.B. Pérez, C.D. García, y E.F. Martínez
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet