La incidencia de las nuevas tecnologías en el derecho al debido proceso

  1. Miguel de Asis Pulido 1
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

Journal:
IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

ISSN: 2444-8478

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 6

Issue: 2

Pages: 186-199

Type: Article

DOI: 10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.I02.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: IUS ET SCIENTIA: Revista electrónica de Derecho y Ciencia

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the incidence of new technologies in the judicial process from the perspective of due process. To achieve its objectives, it is important to analyze how the new tools in ICTs and Artificial Intelligence are influencing the rights that must be respected in the judicial and extrajudicial processes, such as the right of access to justice, the right to legal assistance or the right to an independent and impartial tribunal. To do this, the new technological developments are classified in six legal levels of intervention.

Bibliographic References

  • BRESCIA, R.H., McCARTHY, W., McDONALD, A., POTTS, K. y RIVAIS, C., “Embracing Disruption: How Technological Change in the Delivery of Legal Services Can Improve Access to Justice”, Albany Law Review, vol. 78, nº 2, 2014.
  • BUCHANAN, B. G. y HEADRICK, T. E., “Some Speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 23, nº 1, 1970.
  • DE ASÍS ROIG, R., “Robótica, inteligencia artificial y derecho”, Revista de Privacidad y Derecho Digital, n. 10, 2018.
  • DE LA QUADRA-SALCEDO, T., PIÑAR MAÑAS, J. L. et al., Sociedad digital y Derecho, BOE, 2018.
  • GÓNZALEZ FUSTER, G., European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs, “Artificial Intelligence and Law Enforcement. Impacts on Fundamental Rights”, 2020.
  • NIBLETT, B., Computer science and Law, Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  • NIEVA FENOLL, Enjuiciamiento prima facie, Barcelona, 2017.
  • NIEVA FENOLL, J., Inteligencia artificial y proceso judicial, Marcial Pons, Madrid, 2018.
  • NISSAN, E., “Digital technologies and artificial intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on lawyering, judging, policing and law enforcement”, AI & Society, 2015.
  • PÉREZ LUÑO, A. E., Manual de informática y derecho, Ariel, Barcelona, 1996.
  • REILING, D., “E-Justicia: experiencias con las tecnologías de la información en los tribunales de Europa”, en CABALLERO, J.A., GREGORIO DE GRÀCIA, C. y HAMMERGEN, L., Buenas prácticas para la implementación de soluciones tecnológicas en la administración de justicia, IIJusticia, Buenos Aires, 2011.
  • REMUS, D. y LEVY, F., Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers and the Practice of Law, 2016.
  • SOLAR CAYÓN, J. I., La Inteligencia Artificial Jurídica, El impacto de la innovación tecnológica en la práctica del Derecho y el mercado de servicios jurídicos, ARANZADI, 2019.
  • VAL ROMÁN, J. L., “Industria 4.0: la transformación digital de la industria”, Conferencia de Directores y Decanos de Ingeniería Informática, Facultad de Ingeniería de la Universidad de Deusto, 2020.
  • WEBER, R.C., “Why ‘Watson’ matters to lawyers”, The National Law Journal, Feb., 2011.
  • ZELEZNIKOW, J., “Can Artificial Intelligence And Online Dispute Resolution Enhance Efficiency And Effectiveness In Courts?”, International Journal For Court Administration, 2017.
Data source: Dialnet