Giants with feet of claythe sustainability of the business models in music streaming services

  1. Arenal, Alberto 1
  2. Armuña, Cristina 1
  3. Ramos, Sergio 1
  4. Feijoo, Claudio 2
  5. Aguado, Juan-Miguel 3
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, CAIT
  3. 3 Universidad de Murcia
    info

    Universidad de Murcia

    Murcia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03p3aeb86

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710,  1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2022

Título del ejemplar: Digital audio communication

Volumen: 31

Número: 5

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2022.SEP.09 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

Este artículo analiza la sostenibilidad de la industria musical desde la perspectiva de los intérpretes. Las plataformas de streaming de música, o Proveedores de Servicios de Música Digital (PSMD), han cambiado el paradigma de la industria de la música grabada, especialmente desde la década de 2010. Los modelos de negocio para los intérpretes han evolucionado desde fórmulas de royalty basadas en ingresos a sistemas de remuneración más complejos basados en una combinación de los ingresos derivados a suscripciones de pago y gratuitas basadas en publicidad. Anteriores investigaciones se han centrado mayoritariamente en el análisis de los modelos de negocio de los servicios de streaming desde la perspectiva de los actores de innovación (las plataformas digitales) o de los intermediarios dominantes tradicionales (los sellos discográficos y las editoriales). Sin embargo, no todas las transformaciones derivadas de la innovación son sostenibles. En este artículo planteamos que considerar la sostenibilidad de los modelos de negocio en la industria musical requiere tener en cuenta la perspectiva de los intérpretes. Combinamos una aproximación cualitativa con el análisis de fuentes primarias y secundarias para valorar la sostenibilidad de los modelos de negocio existentes y de las tendencias en prácticas de negocio actuales para diferentes tipos de intérpretes, incluyendo cifras de negocio y cómo los ingresos son compartidos. El articulo concluye que los PSMD favorecen una cadena de valor asimétrica, con actores creativos que apenas pueden capturar valor e innovaciones de base tecnológica que refuerzan la capacidad de capturar valor de los distribuidores digitales. Finalmente, se proponen algunos modelos de negocio alternativos para una sostenibilidad a largo plazo del mercado de la música digital.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este trabajo es un resultado del proyecto de I+D+i Ecosistemas de innovación en las industrias de la comunicación: Actores, tecnologías y configuraciones para la generación de innovación en contenido y comunicación (Innovacom), con referencia PID2020-114007RB-I00 financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España, AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguiar, Luis (2017). “Let the music play? Free streaming and its effects on digital music consumption”. Information economics and policy, v. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.06.002
  • Aguiar, Luis; Waldfogel, Joel (2021). “Platforms, power, and promotion: Evidence from Spotify playlists”. Journal of industrial economics, v. 69 n. 3, pp. 653-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12263
  • Antal, Daniel; Fletcher, Amelia; Ormosi, Peter L. (2021). “Music streaming: Is it a level playing field?” Competition policy international. https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/music-streaming-is-it-a-level-playing-field
  • Apple (n.d.). Apple Music API. Integrate streaming music with Apple Music content. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/applemusicapi
  • Arditi, David (2014). iTake-over: The recording industry in the digital era. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN: 978 1 442240131
  • Arditi, David (2019). “Music everywhere: Setting a digital music trap”. Critical sociology, v. 45, n. 4-5, pp. 617-630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517729192
  • Barnett, Jonathan M. (2018). “The costs of free: Commoditization, bundling and concentration”. Journal of institutional economics, v. 14, n. 6, pp. 1097-1120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000012
  • Benghozi, Pierre-Jean; Salvador, Elisa; Simon, Jean-Paul (2021). “Strategies in the cultural and creative industries: static but flexible vs dynamic and liquid. The emergence of a new model in the digital age”. Revue d’économie industrielle, v. 174, pp. 117-157. https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.10238
  • Benoit, Godin; Gaglio, Gerard (2019). “How does innovation sustain ‘sustainable innovation’?”. In: Boons, Frank; McMeekin, Andrew (eds.). Handbook of sustainable innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 27-37. ISBN: 978 1 788112567 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112574
  • Bloom, Madison (2021). “Spotify facing House Judiciary Committee probe over ‘Discovery Mode’”. Pitchfork. https://pitchfork.com/news/spotify-facing-house-judiciary-committee-probe-over-discovery-mode
  • Butler, Susan (2021). Inside the global digital music market. https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=540734
  • Castle, Chris; Feijoo, Claudio (2021). Study on the artists in the digital music marketplace: Economic and legal considerations. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_41/sccr_41_3.pdf
  • Centre National de la Musique (2021). Le CNM évalue l’impact d’un changement éventuel de mode de rémunération par les plateformes de streaming. https://cnm.fr/le-cnm-evalue-limpact-dun-changement-eventuel-de-mode-de-remuneration-par-les-plateformes-de-streaming
  • DCMS Committee (2020). The Ivors Academy written submission to the DCMS Select Committee Inquiry: The economics of music streaming. UK Parliament. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/15416/pdf
  • Digital Media Association (2020). Who gets paid and how much? https://dima.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DiMA_Who-Gets-Paid_Infographic.pdf
  • Dredge, Stuart (2021). Tidal reveals its user-centric payout plans and adds a free tier. Musically. https://musically.com/2021/11/17/tidal-user-centric-payout-free-tier
  • Escribano, Mario (2020). “Miserias del ‘streaming’: un músico gana 80 euros al mes por ocho millones de escuchas”. El Confidencial, 25 agosto. https://www.elconfidencial.com/cultura/2020-08-25/spotify-youtube-apple-amazon-streaming-musica_2723263
  • Friedlander, Joshua P. (2021). Mid-year 2021 revenue statistics. RIAA report. https://www.riaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Mid-Year-2021-RIAA-Music-Revenue-Report.pdf
  • Geissdoerfer, Martin; Vladimirova, Doroteya; Evans, Steve (2018). “Sustainable business model innovation: A review”. Journal of cleaner production, v. 198, n. 10, pp. 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240
  • Groves, Landon (2020). Hate your favorite band’s latest song? On Spotify, it might be a fake. Input. https://www.inputmag.com/culture/spotify-is-letting-scammers-rip-artists-off-in-plain-sight
  • Gustavsson, Niklas (2012). Pressing play. Pressing play. SlideShare. https://es.slideshare.net/protocol7/spotify-architecture-pressing-play
  • Hesmondhalgh, David (2020). “Is music streaming bad for musicians? Problems of evidence and argument”. New media and society, v. 23, n. 12, pp. 3593-3615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820953541
  • IFPI (2021). Global music report 2020. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/GMR2021_STATE_OF_THE_INDUSTRY.pdf
  • Ingham, Tim (2016). Spotify is making its own records… and putting them on playlists. Music business worldwide. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/spotify-is-creating-its-own-recordings-and-putting-them-on-playlists
  • Ingham, Tim (2021a). Why we believe streaming subscription ARPU fell by around 8% globally for the record industry last year. Music business worldwide. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/why-we-believe-streaming-subscription-arpu-fell-by-around-8-globally-for-the-record-industry-last-year
  • Ingham, Tim (2021b). Over 60,000 tracks are now uploaded to Spotify every day. Music business worldwide. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/over-60000-tracks-are-now-uploaded-to-spotify-daily-thats-nearly-one-per-second
  • Jones, Rhian (2021). “Songwriters fight to be heard in streaming revenues debate”. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/feb/12/songwriters-fight-to-be-heard-in-streaming-revenues-debate
  • Kenney, Martin; Zysman, Josh (2016). “The rise of the platform economy”. Issues in science and technology, v. 32, n. 3, pp. 61-69. https://www.nbp.pl/badania/seminaria/25x2016_2.pdf
  • Leight, Elias (2019). Fake streams could be costing artists $300 million a year. Rolling Stone. https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/features/fake-streams-indie-labels-spotify-tidal-846641
  • Lüdeke-Freund, Florian; Carroux, Sarah; Joyce, Alexandre; Massa, Lorenzo; Breuer, Henning (2018). “The sustainable business model pattern taxonomy: 45 patterns to support sustainability-oriented business model innovation”. Sustainable production and consumption, v. 15, pp. 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.004
  • Mariuzzo, Franco; Ormosi, Peter L. (2020). “Independent v major record labels: Do they compete on a level-playing streaming field?”. SSRN electronic journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729966
  • Massa, Lorenzo; Tucci, Christopher L.; Afuah, Allan (2017). “A critical assessment of business model research”. Academy of management annals, v. 11, n. 1, pp. 73-104. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072
  • Miles, Matthew B.; Huberman, A. Michael (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Negus, Keith (2018). “From creator to data: The post-record music industry and the digital conglomerates”. Media, culture & society, v. 41, n. 3, pp. 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718799395
  • O’Dair, Marcus; Fry, Andrew (2020). “Beyond the black box in music streaming: the impact of recommendation systems upon artists”. Popular communication, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2019.1627548
  • Owsinski, Bobby (2021). Recordings of noise can be more profitable than music on Spotify. Hypebot. https://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2021/01/recordings-of-noise-can-be-more-profitable-than-music-on-spotify.html
  • Payperformers.Eu (2021). Press release: Survey confirms performers’ need for collective management & solutions. Make streamers pay performers through our CMOs. https://www.payperformers.eu/performer-survey-results
  • Prey, Robert (2020). “Locating power in platformization: music streaming playlists and curatorial power”. Social media + society, v. 6, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120933291
  • Sánchez, Daniel (2018). “How much artists make per stream on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, YouTube, Pandora, More (updated for 2022)”. Digital music news. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2018/12/25/streaming-music-services-pay-2019
  • Schaltegger, Stefan; Hansen, Erik G.; Lüdeke-Freund, Florian (2016). “Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues”. Organization & environment, v. 29, n. 1, pp. 3-10. http://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
  • Singleton, Micah (2021). “SoundCloud to let fans pay artists directly”. Billboard. https://www.billboard.com/pro/soundcloud-payout-system-fans-artists-direct-payments
  • Spotify (2020). Amplifying artist input in your personalized recommendations, Nov. 2. https://newsroom.spotify.com/2020-11-02/amplifying-artist-input-in-your-personalized-recommendations
  • Stassen, Murray (2021). “What the major record companies really think about the economics of music streaming”. Music business worldwide. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/what-the-major-record-companies-really-think-about-the-economics-of-music-streaming
  • The Trichordist (2020). 2019-2020 Streaming price bible. https://thetrichordist.com/2020/03/05/2019-2020-streaming-price-bible-youtube-is-still-the-1-problem-to-solve
  • Towse, Ruth (2020). “Dealing with digital: The economic organisation of streamed music”. Media, culture & society, v. 7-8, n. 42, pp. 1461-1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720919376
  • UK Parliament, Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport Committee (2021a). “Second report - Economics of music streaming”. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/646/economics-of-music-streaming/publications
  • UK Parliament, Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee (2021b). “Economics of music streaming. Supplementary written evidence from Sony Music”. Oral Evidence: Economics of Music Streaming (Q599) UK Parliament. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/23082/html
  • Van-Wijk, Jakomijn; Zietsma, Charlene; Dorado, Silvia; De-Bakker, Frank G. A.; Martí, Ignasi (2019). “Social innovation: Integrating micro, meso, and macro level insights from institutional theory”. Business & society, v. 58, n. 5, pp. 887-918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318789104
  • Webster, Jack (2020). “Taste in the platform age: Music streaming services and new forms of class distinction”. Information, communication & society, v. 23 n. 13, pp. 1909-1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1622763
  • WIPO (1996). WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. https://wipolex.wipo.int/es/treaties/textdetails/12743
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet