Perfil del profesorado universitario que emplea un enfoque de enseñanza centrado en el alumnado

  1. David Jiménez Hernández 1
  2. María Tornel Abellán 1
  3. Juan José González Ortíz 2
  4. Patricia Sancho Requena 3
  1. 1 Departamento de Educación, Universidad Católica de San Antonio de Murcia
  2. 2 Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica de San Antonio de Murcia
  3. 3 Departamento de Psicología y Sociología, Universidad de Zaragoza
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Psychology, Society & Education

ISSN: 1989-709X,  2171-2085

Año de publicación: 2019

Volumen: 11

Número: 1

Páginas: 125-135

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.25115/PSYE.V11I1.2125 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psychology, Society & Education

Resumen

Los enfoques de enseñanza a los que recurren los docentes universitarios determinan su forma de afrontar el proceso educativo y su figura como docentes. Éstos pueden ser de dos tipos, centrado en el profesorado/transmisión de la información y centrado en el alumnado/cambio conceptual. El objetivo de esta investigación es dibujar el perfil del profesor universitario según el enfoque docente más empleado. Con este fin, se aplicó el cuestionario ATI (2004) a un total de 501 docentes universitarios de la Región de Murcia. Los resultados muestran que el enfoque centrado en el alumnado es el más empleado entre las profesoras que han recibido formación didáctica, de menor edad o años de experiencia, preferiblemente de la rama de arte o humanidades y ciencias sociales y jurídicas y dependiendo del tipo de universidad a la que pertenece. De este modo, es posible detectar las variables que determinan el uso de este enfoque, en detrimento del anterior, y como consecuencia, las áreas donde es más necesario trabajar para hacer posible el cambio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baeten, M., Dochy, F., y Struyven, K. (2013). Enhancing students’ approaches to learning: the added value of gradually implementing case-based learning. European journal of psychology of education, 28(2), 315-336.
  • Brown, N. L. (2003). How lecturers experience student-centred teaching. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Lancaster University. Lancaster, UK. Recuperado de: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/54004/
  • Bryant, P. A. (2004). Teaching styles of interactive television instructors: A descriptive study. American Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ª Edición). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 112(1), 155-159.
  • De Miguel, M. (2005). Cambio de paradigma metodológico en la Educación Superior. Exigencias que conlleva. Cuadernos de integración europea, 2, 16-27.
  • Drew, L., y Trigwell, K. (2003). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching, teacher satisfaction and communities of practice in art, design and communication courses. Recuperado de: http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/640/1/cltad_ped_res_pap_drew_trigwell.pdf
  • Entwistle, N., y McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.
  • Gibbs, G., y Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active learning in higher education, 5(1), 87-100.
  • Harkness, J. A., y Schoua-Glusberg, A. (1998). Questionnaires in translation. ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 3(1), 87-127. Recuperado de: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic506406.files/znspez3_04_Harkness_Glusberg.pdf
  • Kain, D. J. (2003). Teacher-Centered versus Student-Centered: Balancing Constraint and Theory in the Composition Classroom. Pedagogy, 3(1), 104-108.
  • Kember, D., y Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional science, 28(5), 469-490. Recuperado de: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1026569608656
  • Lindblom‐Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., y Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher education, 31(03), 285-298.
  • Liu, R., Qiao, X., y Liu, Y. (2006). A paradigm shift of learner-centered teaching style: Reality or illusion. Arizona Working papers in SLAT, 13, 77-91.
  • Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and'teaching-scholarship'. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 213-228.
  • McCollin, E. (2000). Faculty and student perceptions of teaching styles: do teaching styles differ for traditional and nontraditional students?. Ponencia presentada en Annual Conference of Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chicago, EE.UU.
  • Monroy, F., Hernández, F., y Martínez, P. M. (2014). Enfoques de enseñanza de estudiantes en formación pedagógica. Un estudio exploratorio. REOP-Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía, 25(3), 90-105.
  • Montero, I., y León, O. G. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., y Holzinger, A. (2002). Student-centered teaching meets new media: Concept and case study. Educational Technology & Society, 5(4), 160-172. Recuperado de: http://www.ifets.info/journals/5_4/renate.html?iframe=trueywidth=100%yheight=100%
  • Nevgi, A., Postareff, L., y Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2004). The effect of discipline on motivational and self-efficacy beliefs and on approaches to teaching of Finnish and English university teachers. Comunicación presentada en A paper presented at the EARLI SIG Higher Education Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Postareff, L. (2007). Teaching in Higher Education: From Content-focused to Learning-focused approaches to teaching. Recuperado de: http://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/19882
  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S. y Nevgi, A. (2008). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56(1), 29-43. Recuperado de: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z
  • Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., y Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 557-571.
  • Postareff, L., y Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109-120.
  • Prosser, M., y Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783-795. Recuperado de: http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=e49a4f7f-89b4-4962-b186-2d1c2622640d%40sessionmgr4008&vid=0&hid=4205
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. C., Valle, A., Paiva, O., y Polydoro, S. (2013). Approaches to teaching in High School when considering contextual variables and teacher variables. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 18(1), 25-42.
  • Shreeve, A., Sims, E., y Trowler, P. (2010). ‘A kind of exchange’: learning from art and design teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 125-138.
  • Sulaiman, W. S. W., Rahman, W. R. A., y Dzulkifli, M. A. (2008). Relationship between Critical Thinking Dispositions, Perceptions towards Teacher, Learning Approaches and Critical Thinking Skills among University Students. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 3(1), 122-133.
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Martin, E., y Ramsden, P. (2005). University teachers’ experiences of change in their understanding of the subject matter they have taught. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 251-264.
  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., y Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher education, 37(1), 57-70. Recuperado de: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1003548313194
  • Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265-275.
  • Trigwell, K., y Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409-424. Recuperado de: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
  • Vale, C., Davies, A., Weaven, M., y Hooley, N. (2010). Student Centred Approaches: Teachers' Learning and Practice. En L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, y C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 587-594). Australia: MERGA.
  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Wiley Company.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet