Combining Assessment Tools for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Computational Thinking Interventions

Referencias bibliográficas

• Basawapatna, A., Koh, K. H., Repenning, A., Webb, D. C., & Marshall, K. S. (2011). Recognizing computational thinking patterns. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 245–250). https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953241 .
• Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., et al. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-implications for policy and practice. Seville: Join Research Center (European Commission). Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC104188/jrc104188_computhinkreport.pdf .
• Brennan, K., Balch, C., & Chung, M. (2014). Creative computing. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–25). Retrieved from http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdf .
• Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2012). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17–32.
• Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001 .
• Dagiene, V., & Futschek, G. (2008). Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: Criteria for good tasks. In International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools-Evolution and Perspectives (pp. 19–30). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2 .
• Daily, S. B., Leonard, A. E., Jörg, S., Babu, S., & Gundersen, K. (2014). Dancing alice: Exploring embodied pedagogical strategies for learning computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 91–96). https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538917 .
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004 .
• Eguiluz, A., Guenaga, M., Garaizar, P., & Olivares-Rodriguez, C. (2017). Exploring the progression of early programmers in a set of computational thinking challenges via clickstream analysis. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (in press). https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2768550 .
• Grover, S. (2011). Robotics and engineering for middle and high school students to develop computational thinking. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/69a7/c5909726eed5bd66719aad69565ce46bbdcc.pdf .
• Grover, S. (2015). “Systems of assessments” for deeper learning of computational thinking in K-12. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 15–20). Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/sites/default/files/publications/aera2015-_systems_of_assessments_for_deeper_learning_of_computational_thinking_in_k-12.pdf .
• Grover, S., Basu, S., Bienkowski, M., Eagle, M., Diana, N., & Stamper, J. (2017). A framework for using hypothesis-driven approaches to support data-driven learning analytics in measuring computational thinking in block-based programming environments. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(3), 14:1–14:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3105910 .
• Grover, S., Bienkowski, M., Niekrasz, J., & Hauswirth, M. (2016). Assessing problem-solving process at scale. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 245–248).
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12 a review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051 .
• Kalelioglu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596. Retrieved from http://www.bjmc.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/projekti/bjmc/Contents/4_3_15_Kalelioglu.pdf .
• Koh, K. H., Basawapatna, A., Bennett, V., & Repenning, A. (2010). Towards the automatic recognition of computational thinking for adaptive visual language learning. In 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 59–66). https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2010.17 .
• Koh, K. H., Basawapatna, A., Nickerson, H., & Repenning, A. (2014). Real time assessment of computational thinking. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 49–52). https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2014.6883021 .
• Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005 .
• Kukul, V., Gökçearslan, S., & Günbatar, M. S. (2017). Computer programming self-efficacy scale (CPSES) for secondary school students: Development, validation and reliability. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 7(1). Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/etku/article/view/5000195912 .
• Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012 .
• Maiorana, F., Giordano, D., & Morelli, R. (2015). Quizly: A live coding assessment platform for App Inventor. In 2015 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (Blocks and Beyond) (pp. 25–30). https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2015.7368995 .
• Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2013). Learning computer science concepts with scratch. Computer Science Education, 23(3), 239–264.
• Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2015). Dr. Scratch: Automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinking. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 15(46), 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/ead/red/46/moreno_robles.pdf .
• Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2016). Comparing computational thinking development assessment scores with software complexity metrics. In 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1040–1045). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474681 .
• Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2017). Towards data-driven learning paths to develop computational thinking with scratch. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETC.2017.2734818 .
• Moreno-León, J., Román-González, M., Harteveld, C., & Robles, G. (2017). On the automatic assessment of computational thinking skills: A comparison with human experts. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2788–2795). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053216 .
• Mühling, A., Ruf, A., & Hubwieser, P. (2015). Design and first results of a psychometric test for measuring basic programming abilities. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 2–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818320 .
• Ota, G., Morimoto, Y., & Kato, H. (2016). Ninja code village for scratch: Function samples/function analyser and automatic assessment of computational thinking concepts. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (pp. 238–239).
• Román-González, M. (2015). Computational thinking test: Design guidelines and content validation. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN 2015) (pp. 2436–2444). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4203.4329 .
• Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2017a). Complementary tools for computational thinking assessment. In S. C. Kong, J. Sheldon, & K. Y. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (CTE 2017) (pp. 154–159). The Education University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.eduhk.hk/cte2017/doc/CTE2017Proceedings.pdf .
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017b). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047 .
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 .
• Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or be programmed: Ten commands for a digital age. New York: OR Books.
• Sadin, É. (2015). La vie algorithmique: Critique de la raison numérique [The Algorithmic Life: A Critique of Digital Rationality]. Paris: L’Echappée.
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003 .
• Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Using commutative assessments to compare conceptual understanding in blocks-based and text-based programs. In ICER (Vol. 15, pp. 101–110).
• Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., & Kawamoto, D. C. (2012). The fairy performance assessment: Measuring computational thinking in middle school. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 215–220).
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215 .
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 .
• Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/2576872 .
• Zur-Bargury, I., Pârv, B., & Lanzberg, D. (2013). A nationwide exam as a tool for improving a new curriculum. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 267–272).