Las metáforas emocionales de los estudiantes de educación primaria y educación infantil

  1. Lucía Mellado
  2. Mª Luisa Bermejo
  3. Mª Isabel Fajardo
  4. Ana Belén Borrachero
Aldizkaria:
International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

ISSN: 0214-9877

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Zenbakien izenburua: Familia y Educación: Aspectos Positivos

Alea: 1

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 281-289

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD. Revista de Psicología

Laburpena

This study analyzes the personal metaphors related to emotions of students in the first year of master degree studies from the Faculty of Education of Badajoz. The sample comes from students of primary teachers during the year 2010/2011 where he raised two open questions. In research conducted metaphors in the four categories of Leavy et al. (2007): transmissive/ behavioral, cognitive/constructivist, situated and self-referential. The results obtained indicate that the category with most general metaphors was the behaviourist/transmissive, followed by cognitive/constructivist and the self-referenced. However the most emotional metaphors fall into the self-referencial and cognitive/constructivist categories, followed by situated and behaviourist/ transmissive, although some teachers expressed metaphors framed in more than one category

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G. y Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphor and analogy. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison y S. T. Ritchie (eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 1-9). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N. y Kron, F.W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 277-290.
  • Boujaoude, S. (2000). Conceptions of science teaching revealed by metaphors and answers to open- ended questions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 173-186.
  • Gallego, R. y Pérez, R. (2002). El problema del cambio en las concepciones de estudiantes de for- mación avanzada . Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(3), 401-414.
  • Gurney, B. F. (1995). Tugboats and tennis games: Preservice conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6), 569-583.
  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teach- ers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.
  • Lakoff, G., y Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Leavy, A. M., McSorley, F. A. y Boté, L. A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1217-1233.
  • Lorsbach, A. W., Tobin, K; Briscoe, C. & Lamaster, S.U. (1992). An interpretation of assesment methods in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 305-317.
  • Martín, G. (2000). Curso de redacción: teoría y práctica de la composición y del estilo. Madrid: Editorial Paraninfo
  • Martínez, M.A., Sauleda, N. y Huber, G. H. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teach- ing and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 965-977.
  • Ritchie, S. M., Aubusson, P. J. y Harrison, A. G. (2006). Metaphorically thinking, In P. J Aubusson, A. G. Harrison y S. T. Ritchie (eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 189-195). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Russell, T. y Hrycenko, M. (2006). The role of Metaphor in a new science teacher’s learning from experience. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison y S. T. Ritchie (eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 131-142). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 290-305
  • Thomas, L. C. y Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762-769.
  • Tobin, K. y Fraser, B. J. (1989). Barriers to higher-level cognitive learning high school science. Science Education, 73 (6), 659-582.
  • Tobin, K. y Tippins, D.J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science education . Science Education, 80(6), 711-730.
  • Treagust, D.F. y Harrison, A.G. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: an analysis of Richard Feynman’s lecture “Atoms in motions”. International Journal of science Education, 22(11), 1157-1170.
  • Zembylas, M. (2004). Emotion metaphors and emotional labor in science teaching. Science Education, 88(3), 301-324.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet