Deslocalización de espacios y tiempos formativos universitarios con TIC

  1. Sevillano-García, María Luisa 1
  2. Vázquez-Cano, Esteban 1
  3. Pascual-Sevillano, María Ángeles 2
  1. 1 Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
    info

    Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02msb5n36

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

ISSN: 2386-7418

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: XIV Congreso Psicopedagogía. Área 13: TECNOLOGÍAS Y COMUNICACIÓN EDUCATIVA

Issue: 13

Pages: 363-367

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17979/REIPE.2017.0.13.2106 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The Horizon 2020 Report (H2020) fosters innovation as an objective, showing the potential and possibilities of modern technologies. The objective of this research was to analyze in which places and educational uses of mobile digital devices Spanish and Latinamerican university students do. We conclude that the main digital device in the Hispanic world was the smartphone. The most significant differences indicate that in Spain the smartphone is used frequently in classroomsand the laptop outside the campus. In Latinamerica the smartphone is used more frequently outside the campus and the laptop inside the campus for educational purposes.

Bibliographic References

  • ADOBE (2014). U.S. Mobile Benchmark Report ADOBE DIGITAL INDEX. http://www.cmo.com/content/dam/CMO_Other/ADI/ADI_Mobile_Report_2014/2014_US_Mobile_Benchmark_Report.pdf
  • Deloitte (2014). Consumo Móvil en España 2014 Revolución y evolución. http://www2.deloitte.com/es/es/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/consumo-medios-espana.html
  • Dennen, V. P., & Hao, S. (2014). Intentionally mobile pedagogy: the M-COPE framework for mobile learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(3), 397-419.
  • Ericsoon (2014a). EUROPE ERICSSON MOBILITY REPORT APPENDIX. http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2014/emr-june2014-regional-appendices-europe.pdf Ericsson (2014b). Ericsson Mobility Report ON THE PULSE OF THE NETWORKED SOCIETY.http://www.ericsson.com/mobility-report
  • Gegenfurtner, A., Veermans, K., & Vauras, M. (2013). Effects of computer support, collaboration, and time lag on performance self-efficacy and transfer of training: A longitudinal meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 8, 75-89.
  • GSMA (2014) The Mobile Economy 2014. http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/
  • Kamarainen, A.; Metcalf, S.; Grotzer, T.;, Browne, A.; Mazzuca, D.;, Tutweiler, M.S. y Dede, C. (2012). Ecomobile: Integrating augmented reality and probe ware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545-556.
  • Liao, T. (2015). Augmented or admented reality? The influence of marketing on augmented reality technologies. Information Communication & Society, 18(3), 310-326.
  • Nielsen (2013). THE MOBILE CONSUMER A GLOBAL SNAPSHOT. http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/ reports downloads/2013%20Reports/MobileConsumer-Report-2013.pdf
  • Sevillano-Garcia, M.L y Vázquez –Cano. E. ( 2015) Modelos de investigación en contextos ubicuos y móviles en Educación Superior. Madrid: McGrawHill
  • UNESCO (2013). UNESCO Policy Guidelines for Mobile Learning. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizatino
  • Webcertain (2014). The Webcertain Global Search and Social Report 2014. http://internationaldigitalhub.com/en/publications/the -webcertain-global-search-and-social-report-2014
Data source: Dialnet